Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of Ceftriaxone versus Cefotaxime for Childhood Upper Urinary Tract Infections
- Source :
- Journal of Chemotherapy. 8:59-62
- Publication Year :
- 1996
- Publisher :
- Informa UK Limited, 1996.
-
Abstract
- It is very important to treat patients with upper urinary tract infections (UTIs) promptly and effectively because of the potential sequelae. In the present study we compare the efficacy of the two cephalosporins, ceftriaxone and cefotaxime, in childhood pyelonephritis. The study protocal included 10 days of drug therapy. Both in patients receiving ceftriaxone and cefotaxime, successful eradication was achieved at the second day of therapy. The overall cure rate was significantly better in the ceftriaxone group than the cefotaxime group in terms of recurrence and reinfections (p0.05). Furthermore, in the complicated group, ceftriaxone was slightly superior to cefotaxime, approaching significance in terms of preventing recurrent infections. No serious adverse effects were observed in either of the groups. The present study has shown that ceftriaxone exhibits favorable clinical and bacteriologic efficacy in patients with complicated and uncomplicated upper UTI. Once-daily injection of ceftriaxone in children is also an attractive advantage of the drug when compared to twice-daily cefotaxime.
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Cefotaxime
Adolescent
Bacteriuria
medicine.drug_class
Antibiotics
Cephalosporin
Pharmacotherapy
Double-Blind Method
Enterobacteriaceae
Internal medicine
medicine
Humans
Pharmacology (medical)
Child
Adverse effect
Antibacterial agent
Upper urinary tract
Pharmacology
Pyelonephritis
business.industry
Ceftriaxone
Cephalosporins
Surgery
Radiography
Infectious Diseases
Oncology
Child, Preschool
Urinary Tract Infections
Female
business
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 19739478 and 1120009X
- Volume :
- 8
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Chemotherapy
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....44f9b76c310008d3a7175333ac6faaf3
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1179/joc.1996.8.1.59