Back to Search Start Over

Complexes of Ni(II) and Cu(II) with small peptides: deciding whether to deprotonate

Authors :
Robert C. Dunbar
Jos Oomens
Jonathan Martens
Giel Berden
Molecular Spectroscopy (HIMS, FNWI)
HIMS Other Research (FNWI)
Faculty of Science
Source :
PCCP Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 18, 38, pp. 26923-26932, PCCP Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 18, 26923-26932, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 18(38), 26923-26932. Royal Society of Chemistry
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Royal Society of Chemistry, 2016.

Abstract

The observed variety of metal-ion complexation sites offered by peptides reflects a basic tension between charge solvation of the ion by Lewis-basic chelating groups versus amide nitrogen deprotonation and formation of metal–nitrogen bonds. Gas-phase models of metal-ion coordination can illuminate the factors governing this choice in condensed-phase proteins and enzymes. Here, structures of gas-phase complexes of Ni(II) and Cu(II) with tri- and tetra-peptide ligands are mapped out using a combination of Infrared Multiple Photon Dissociation (IRMPD) spectroscopy and density functional theory (DFT) computations. The two binding modes give distinctive IRMPD signatures, particularly in the diagnostic region 1500–1550 cm−1. Previous observations have suggested that Ni(II) complexes preferentially show the iminol rearrangement pattern (Im) giving low-spin square-planar geometries with metal-ion bonds to deprotonated amide nitrogens. In contrast, alkaline earth metal ion complexes prefer amide carbonyl oxygens chelating the metal ion with pyramidal geometry (charge-solvation, CS). Surprisingly, it is shown here that the Gly4 complexes are CS bound, in contrast with the expectation of Im binding. It is suggested that CS binding is actually a normal Ni(II) and Cu(II) binding mode to simple peptides lacking participating side chains. Three factors are suggested to influence the choice between CS and Im binding patterns: (1) presence of an accessible side-chain Lewis-basic proton interaction site (FGGF, FGG and HAA complexes); (2) short chain length of the peptide leading to a shortage of accessible carbonyl oxygen sites for CS binding, (AAA, FGG and HAA complexes); (3) outright deprotonation of the ligand giving net negatively charged Im[Ni2+(Gly4–3H+)]− and Im[Ni2+(Ala3–3H+)]− complexes, which have a triply-deprotonated ligand. IRMPD spectra of [Cu2+Gly4]2+ and [Cu2+(Gly4–3H+)]− complexes suggest that their structures are similar to their Ni2+ analogs.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14639084 and 14639076
Volume :
18
Issue :
38
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....44f654d3a7f0d86ce6f2f4c21f64d1e4
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cp03974j