Back to Search Start Over

Antibody response using six different serological assays in a completely PCR-tested community after a coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak—the CoNAN study

Authors :
Michael Bauer
Gabi Hanf
Steffi Kolanos
Michael Baier
H Proquittè
Mathias W. Pletz
André Scherag
Juliane Scholz
Michael Kiehntopf
Christine Pinkwart
Local Cooperation Partners
Stefan Glöckner
Nico Andreas
Stefan Hagel
Sebastian Weis
Oliwia Makarewicz
Christina Bahrs
Aurelia Kimmig
Juliane Ankert
Raphaela Marquardt
Renate Koch
Franziska Röstel
Annika Licht
Jennifer Kosenkow
Petra Dickmann
Matthias Ullrich
Clara Schnizer
Stefanie Deinhardt-Emmer
Wibke Wetzker
Joel Guerra
Dagmar Rimek
Sebastian Kuhn
Lara Thieme
Cornelius Eibner
Jasmin Müller
Thomas Hotz
Thomas Kamradt
Cora Richert
Bettina Meinung
Steffen Mai
Anita Hartung
Petra Enders
Kay Stötzer
Julia Köhler
Bettina Löffler
Daniel Weiss
Hans Cipowicz
Source :
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

Objectives Due to a substantial proportion of asymptomatic and mild courses, many severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections remain unreported. Therefore, assessment of seroprevalence may detect the real burden of disease. We aimed to determine and characterize the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infections and the resulting seroprevalence in a defined population. The primary objective of the study was to assess SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence using six different IgG-detecting immunoassays. Secondary objectives of the study were: (a) to determine potential risk factors for symptomatic versus asymptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 courses, and (b) to investigate the rate of virus RNA-persistence. Methods CoNAN is a population-based cohort study performed in the community Neustadt am Rennsteig, Germany, which was quarantined from 22 March to 5 April after six SARS-CoV-2 cases were detected in the village's population. The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak comprised 51 cases and 3 deaths. The CoNAN study was performed from 13 May to 22 May 2020, 6 weeks after a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. Results We enrolled a total of 626 participants (71% of the community population) for PCR and antibody testing in the study. All actual SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests were negative. Fifty-two out of 620 (8.4%) participants had antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in at least two different assays. There were 38 participants with previously PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of those, only 19 (50%) displayed anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. We also show that antibody-positive participants with symptoms compatible with a respiratory tract infection had significantly higher antibody levels then asymptomatic participants (EU-assay: median 2.9 versus 7.2 IgG-index, p 0.002; DS-assay: median 45.2 versus 143 AU/mL, p 0.002). Persisting viral replication was not detected. Conclusions Our data question the relevance and reliability of IgG antibody testing to detect past SARS-CoV-2 infections 6 weeks after an outbreak. We conclude that assessing immunity for SARS-CoV-2 infection should not rely on antibody tests alone.

Details

ISSN :
1198743X
Volume :
27
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....444b305523a9c7a04a11586be8000029
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.009