Back to Search Start Over

Definition and Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for Neurosarcoidosis

Authors :
David B. Clifford
Siddharama Pawate
Jeffrey M. Gelfand
Allan Krumholz
David R. Moller
Jinny Tavee
Marjolein Drent
Allen J. Aksamit
Walter Royal
Marc A. Judson
Robert P. Baughman
Barney J. Stern
Joseph R. Berger
Carlos A. Pardo
Source :
JAMA Neurology. 75(12):1546-1553
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Importance The Neurosarcoidosis Consortium Consensus Group, an expert panel of physicians experienced in the management of patients with sarcoidosis and neurosarcoidosis, engaged in an iterative process to define neurosarcoidosis and develop a practical diagnostic approach to patients with suspected neurosarcoidosis. This panel aimed to develop a consensus clinical definition of neurosarcoidosis to enhance the clinical care of patients with suspected neurosarcoidosis and to encourage standardization of research initiatives that address this disease. Observations The work of this collaboration included a review of the manifestations of neurosarcoidosis and the establishment of an approach to the diagnosis of this disorder. The proposed consensus diagnostic criteria, which reflect current knowledge, provide definitions for possible, probable, and definite central and peripheral nervous system sarcoidosis. The definitions emphasize the need to evaluate patients with findings suggestive of neurosarcoidosis for alternate causal factors, including infection and malignant neoplasm. Also emphasized is the need for biopsy, whenever feasible and advisable according to clinical context and affected anatomy, of nonneural tissue to document the presence of systemic sarcoidosis and support a diagnosis of probable neurosarcoidosis or of neural tissue to support a diagnosis of definite neurosarcoidosis. Conclusions and Relevance Diverse disease presentations and lack of specificity of relevant diagnostic tests contribute to diagnostic uncertainty. This uncertainty is compounded by the absence of a pathognomonic histologic tissue examination. The diagnostic criteria we propose are designed to focus investigations on NS as accurately as possible, recognizing that multiple pathophysiologic pathways may lead to the clinical manifestations we currently term NS. Research recognizing the clinical heterogeneity of this diagnosis may open the door to identifying meaningful biologic factors that may ultimately contribute to better treatments.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21686149
Volume :
75
Issue :
12
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JAMA Neurology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....4411c0cde48139f533e9ebfcb459681d