Back to Search Start Over

Discontinuity of the Bowel Following Damage Control Operation Revisited: A Multi-institutional Study

Authors :
Peep Talving
Joseph J. DuBose
Pedro G.R. Teixeira
Thomas M. Scalea
Joseph P. Minei
Konstantinos Chouliaras
Margaret H. Lauerman
Demetrios Demetriades
Alexander L. Eastman
Source :
World Journal of Surgery. 41:146-151
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2016.

Abstract

Discontinuity of the bowel following intestinal injury and resection is a common practice in damage control procedures for severe abdominal trauma. However, there are concerns that complete occlusion of the bowel, especially in the presence of hypotension or edema that may result in ischemic bowel changes or increase bacterial or toxin translocation. This was a retrospective study from three Level-1 trauma centers. Included were trauma patients who required bowel resection and damage control. The study population was stratified into two groups based on the management for bowel injury: bowel discontinuity versus primary anastomosis. Outcomes included anastomotic leak, organ space infection, bowel ischemia, and mortality. A total of 167 cases were included. In 84 cases, continuity of the bowel was established, and in 83, the bowel was left in discontinuity. The epidemiological, admission, and intraoperative physiological characteristics, the abdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale, type of intra-abdominal injury, and transfusion requirements were similar in the two study groups. The mortality was 8.3 % in the continuity group and 16.9 % for the discontinuity group (p = 0.096). On the crude bivariate and adjusted regression analyses, there was a higher rate of bowel ischemia at the take-back operation in the discontinuity group (p = 0.003 for the crude and p = 0.034 for the adjusted). The organ space infection and anastomotic leak rate were not significantly different between the study groups. Discontinuity of the bowel following damage control operation is associated with a higher risk of bowel ischemia than in patients with anastomosis. Further prospective observational and randomized studies are warranted. III.

Details

ISSN :
14322323 and 03642313
Volume :
41
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
World Journal of Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....43f2a4e8f62d060efcf12075568af4b7
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3685-9