Back to Search Start Over

Detecting biological responses to flow management: missed opportunities; future directions

Authors :
Yves Souchon
Mark Gard
Christos Katopodis
N. LeRoy Poff
Dudley Reiser
Jeffrey L. Kershner
Paul Leonard
Robert Deibel
Berton Lee Lamb
Catherine Sabaton
William J. Miller
Biologie des écosystèmes aquatiques (UR BELY)
Centre national du machinisme agricole, du génie rural, des eaux et forêts (CEMAGREF)
EDF (EDF)
US FOREST SERVICE FORT COLLINS USA
Partenaires IRSTEA
Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)-Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)
R2 RESOURCE CONSULTANT USA
US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BOZEMAN USA
US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE SACRAMENTO USA
FRESHWATER INSTITUTE WINNIPEG CAN
ENTRIX ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS ATLANTA USA
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FORT COLLINS USA
MILLER ECOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS FORT COLLINS USA
United States Geological Survey (USGS)
Source :
River Research and Applications, River Research and Applications, Wiley, 2008, 24 (5), pp.506-518. ⟨10.1002/rra.1134⟩
Publication Year :
2008
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2008.

Abstract

The conclusions of numerous stream restoration assessments all around the world are extremely clear and convergent: there has been insufficient appropriate monitoring to improve general knowledge and expertise. In the specialized field of instream flow alterations, we consider that there are several opportunities comparable to full-size experiments. Hundreds of water management decisions related to instream flow releases have been made by government agencies, native peoples, and non-governmental organizations around the world. These decisions are based on different methods and assumptions and many flow regimes have been adopted by formal or informal rules and regulations. Although, there have been significant advances in analytical capabilities, there has been very little validation monitoring of actual outcomes or research related to the response of aquatic dependent species to new flow regimes. In order to be able to detect these kinds of responses and to better guide decision, a general design template is proposed. The main steps of this template are described and discussed, in terms of objectives, hypotheses, variables, time scale, data management, and information, in the spirit of adaptive management. The adoption of such a framework is not always easy, due to differing interests of actors for the results, regarding the duration of monitoring, nature of funding and differential timetables between facilities managers and technicians. Nevertheless, implementation of such a framework could help researchers and practitioners to coordinate and federate their efforts to improve the general knowledge of the links between the habitat dynamics and biological aquatic responses.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15351459 and 15351467
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
River Research and Applications, River Research and Applications, Wiley, 2008, 24 (5), pp.506-518. ⟨10.1002/rra.1134⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....437db8b00eeb8c9923b0db74c4f3c945