Back to Search Start Over

The lung immuno-oncology prognostic score (LIPS-3): a prognostic classification of patients receiving first-line pembrolizumab for PD-L1 ≥ 50% advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Authors :
Russano Marco
Francesca Mazzoni
Stefania Gori
Michele Montrone
Federica Zoratto
Sebastiano Buti
A. De Giglio
R. Berardi
Giovanni Mansueto
Diego Cortinovis
G. Lo Russo
Rita Chiari
Lorenza Landi
Alessandro Morabito
G. Porzio
Fabrizio Citarella
Francesco Grossi
Olga Nigro
Pamela Pizzutilo
Marco Filetti
Gabriele Minuti
Alex Friedlaender
Francesca Rastelli
Giulio Metro
Alfredo Addeo
Emilio Bria
Raffaele Giusti
Giuseppe Luigi Banna
Marcello Tiseo
Giorgia Guaitoli
Luca Cantini
Danilo Rocco
M. De Tursi
Joachim G.J.V. Aerts
A. De Toma
Ettore D'Argento
Clelia Donisi
Diego Signorelli
Claudio Genova
Marianna Macerelli
Corrado Ficorella
Alessio Cortellini
Alain Gelibter
P. Di Marino
Fausto Barbieri
V. Di Noia
Pulmonary Medicine
Source :
ESMO Open, 6(2):100078. BMJ Publishing Group, ESMO Open
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier B.V., 2021.

Abstract

Background To stratify the prognosis of patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥ 50% advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) treated with first-line immunotherapy. Methods Baseline clinical prognostic factors, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), PD-L1 tumour cell expression level, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and their combination were investigated by a retrospective analysis of 784 patients divided between statistically powered training (n = 201) and validation (n = 583) cohorts. Cut-offs were explored by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and a risk model built with validated independent factors by multivariate analysis. Results NLR < 4 was a significant prognostic factor in both cohorts (P < 0.001). It represented 53% of patients in the validation cohort, with 1-year overall survival (OS) of 76.6% versus 44.8% with NLR > 4, in the validation series. The addition of PD-L1 ≥ 80% (21% of patients) or LDH < 252 U/l (25%) to NLR < 4 did not result in better 1-year OS (of 72.6% and 74.1%, respectively, in the validation cohort). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 2 [P < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 2.04], pretreatment steroids (P < 0.001, HR 1.67) and NLR < 4 (P < 0.001, HR 2.29) resulted in independent prognostic factors. A risk model with these three factors, namely, the lung immuno-oncology prognostic score (LIPS)-3, accurately stratified three OS risk-validated categories of patients: favourable (0 risk factors, 40%, 1-year OS of 78.2% in the whole series), intermediate (1 or 2 risk factors, 54%, 1-year OS 53.8%) and poor (>2 risk factors, 5%, 1-year OS 10.7%) prognosis. Conclusions We advocate the use of LIPS-3 as an easy-to-assess and inexpensive adjuvant prognostic tool for patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50% aNSCLC.<br />Highlights • Immunotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy combinations are currently not superior to immunotherapy alone for high PD-L1 aNSCLC. • NLR with a cut-off of 4 was validated as an independent prognostic factor for immunotherapy in high PD-L1 aNSCLC. • The addition of either PD-L1 ≥ 80% or LDH < 252 U/l to NLR < 4 did not result in better prognostic stratification. • The LIPS-3 is a validated 3-class prognostic classification based on the NLR, ECOG PS and pretreatment steroids. • The LIPS-3 is a routinely assessable adjuvant prognostic tool for high PD-L1 aNSCLC patients.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20597029
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
ESMO Open, 6(2):100078. BMJ Publishing Group, ESMO Open
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....432d8153c3732f97fe9f27b6c53355e0