The impact of the shift system on health and quality of life of sleep technicians

Background Sleep technicians are at high risk of shift work sleep disorders. We therefore aimed to identify the optimal shift system for sleep technicians. Methods We performed a nationwide survey of the work schedules, health and quality of life of sleep technicians using e-mail questionnaires including the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Epworth Sleep Scale (ESS), Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire-10 (FOSQ-10), Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in Korea. A multivariate general linear model was used to assess the effect of shift schedules on health and quality of life. Results Fifty-four technicians from 30 sleep laboratories participated. Their work schedules were classified as fixed night (F) (n = 18), slow rotation alternating from a night-only to a day-only schedule with a 3-months to one-year interval (S) (n = 20), rapid rotation within a week (R) (n = 5), night once a week (D+) (n = 5) and day (D) (n = 6). The adjusted ISI and HADS-anxiety scores were higher in F, S, and R than D and D+. Among night shift-dominant schedules, a less favorable profile was observed for R followed by F, and S regarding the ISI, FOSQ-10, mental SF-12 and HADS-depression. The physical SF-12 was lower in the order of R, S and F. The HADS-anxiety score was higher in the order of F, R and S. Conclusions The S system appears to have the least negative effect on health and quality of life among night shift-dominant systems. The development of consensus guidelines for scheduling shifts in sleep laboratories is urged.