Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of Point-of-Care and Classical Immunoassays for the Monitoring Infliximab and Antibodies Against Infliximab in IBD

Authors :
Anne-Emmanuelle Berger
Yara Nasser
Xavier Roblin
Ines Harzallah
Stéphane Paul
Remi Labetoulle
Source :
Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 63:2714-2721
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2018.

Abstract

The primary objective is to assess whether the POC assays to measure infliximab residual trough level in the serum of IBD patients were non-inferior to the ELISA techniques available on the market, and to determine which of them was the most robust. The second is to compare three different ELISA kits for monitoring anti-infliximab antibodies (ATI). The assays were carried out on patients’ sera using four ELISA kits from four different suppliers (three with a monoclonal antibody and one polyclonal) and two rapid techniques provided by BUHLMANN (Quantum Blue®) and R-Biopharm (Ridaquick) for monitoring infliximab levels. ATI were measured by three ELISA sets (Grifols, Theradiag, and R-Biopharm) which have different positivity limits and different units. We measured infliximab residual level and ATI in the serum of 90 IBD patients (85 treated with infliximab and five with adalimumab). All of the infliximab assays were very well correlated when analyzed with Spearman nonparametric correlation (0.93 ≤ r ≤ 0.99), and the two POC assays were also excellently correlated (r = 0.98). The ATI monitoring kits revealed a correlation ranging from 0.73 to 0.96 when comparing positive and negative patients. When normalizing the quantitative values between the different ELISA tests (expressed arbitrarily by using multiples of the positivity limits defined by each supplier), the Spearman r coefficient ranged from 0.81 to 0.93. The available evidence allows us to conclude that all of the infliximab monitoring assays correlate well and may be used for IFX monitoring; albeit variations in measured IFX concentration among different assays remain present, these assays could be interchangeable. The ATI monitoring techniques are all capable of detecting ATI-positive patients, but because of the difference in the positivity limits and the measurement units, it is better to follow a patient rate with one definite kit.

Details

ISSN :
15732568 and 01632116
Volume :
63
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....42d59f81c95278fcda53421fb9bc80c1
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5144-y