Back to Search Start Over

Systematic development of a tennis injury prevention programme

Authors :
Evert Verhagen
Babette M Pluim
J L Tol
Ivo J. H. Tiemessen
Stefan Bodde
Vincent Gouttebarge
Haiko I M F L Pas
Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs
Graduate School
AMS - Sports & Work
Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine
VU University medical center
APH - Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases
Public and occupational health
Amsterdam Movement Sciences - Sports and Work
Source :
Pas, H I M F L, Bodde, S, Kerkhoffs, G M M J, Pluim, B, Tiemessen, I J H, Tol, J L, Verhagen, E & Gouttebarge, V 2018, ' Systematic development of a tennis injury prevention programme ', BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, vol. 4, no. 1, e000350 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000350, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000350, BMJ Open Sport — Exercise Medicine, BMJ Open Sport and Exercise Medicine, 4(1):e000350. BMJ Publishing Group, BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 4(1):e000350. BMJ Publishing Group
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
BMJ, 2018.

Abstract

IntroductionDespite an injury incidence of up to 3.0/1000 hours of play, there are no published tennis injury prevention programmes. This article aims to describe the developmental process of TennisReady, an e-health tennis-specific injury programme for adult recreational tennis players.Five-step approachA bottom-up, five-step approach was used with the Knowledge Transfer Scheme as a guideline. During the first step, a problem statement among targeted users was carried out. 475 (partially) completed surveys and group interviews (n=8) revealed a preference for an app-based prevention intervention of 10–15 min. As a second step, a systematic review was performed to identify prevention strategies in tennis. None were found. In step 3, during two expert group meetings (n=18), the findings of the first two steps were discussed and goals were formulated. Relevant and potential exercises for the programme were discussed. A subgroup of a total of six physical therapists, physicians and trainers developed the content of the programme in step 4. Step 5 included an evaluation of the exercises in 33 recreational tennis players. Participants evaluated the exercises during training sessions with trainers involved in the programme’s development or their colleagues. Participants evaluated the programme through standardised surveys or group interviews. Based on this evaluation, the programme was adjusted by altering exercises and frequencies, and it was evaluated in a second target group (n=27). The second evaluation did not result in any major changes to the final prevention programme.ConclusionThrough a five-step approach guided by the Knowledge Transfer Scheme, we developed an e-health tennis-specific prevention programme for adult tennis players. This 10 min intervention will require testing in a randomised controlled setting.

Details

ISSN :
20557647
Volume :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....42bc058bee01af4dd36b519d70173427
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000350