Back to Search
Start Over
Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of antiretroviral drugs against SARS, MERS or COVID‐19: initial assessment
- Source :
- Journal of the International AIDS Society, Journal of the International AIDS Society, 23(4):e25489
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Wiley, 2020.
-
Abstract
- Introduction Several antiretroviral drugs are being considered for the treatment of COVID‐19, the disease caused by a newly identified coronavirus, (SARS‐CoV‐2). We systematically reviewed the clinical outcomes of using antiretroviral drugs for the prevention and treatment of coronaviruses and planned clinical trials. Methods Three databases were screened from inception to 30 March 2020 for studies reporting clinical outcomes of patients with SARS, MERS or COVID‐19 treated with antiretrovirals. Results From an initial screen of 433 titles, two randomized trials and 24 observational studies provided clinical outcome data on the use of antiretroviral drugs; most studies reported outcomes using LPV/r as treatment. Of the 21 observational studies reporting treatment outcomes, there were three studies among patients with SARS, six studies among patients with MERS and 12 studies among patients with COVID‐19. In one randomized trial 99 patients with severe COVID‐19 illness were randomized to receive LPV/r (400/100 mg twice a day) and 100 patients to standard of care for 14 days: LPV/r was not associated with a statistically significant difference in time to clinical improvement, although LPV/r given within 12 days of symptoms was associated with shorter time to clinical improvement; 28 day mortality was numerically lower in the LPV/r group (14/99) compared to the control group (25/100), but this difference was not statistically significant. The second trial found no benefit. The certainty of the evidence for the randomized trials was low. In the observational studies 3 out of 361 patients who received LPV/r died; the certainty of evidence was very low. Three studies reported a possible protective effect of LPV/r as post‐exposure prophylaxis. Again, the certainty of the evidence was very low due to uncertainty due to limited sample size. Conclusions On the basis of the available evidence it is uncertain whether LPV/r and other antiretrovirals improve clinical outcomes or prevent infection among patients at high risk of acquiring COVID‐19.
- Subjects :
- Male
coronavirus
Review
Disease
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
Lopinavir
law.invention
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
law
Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active
Medicine
030212 general & internal medicine
Middle Aged
Drug Combinations
Infectious Diseases
Anti-Retroviral Agents
Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus
Female
Coronavirus Infections
0305 other medical science
medicine.drug
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Pneumonia, Viral
antiretroviral therapy
MEDLINE
Reviews
Betacoronavirus
03 medical and health sciences
MERS
COVID‐19
Internal medicine
Humans
Pandemics
SARS
Ritonavir
030505 public health
SARS-CoV-2
business.industry
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
COVID-19
HIV
COVID-19 Drug Treatment
Clinical trial
Sample size determination
Observational study
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 17582652
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of the International AIDS Society
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....423a463251b7ace0135348b2949700c0
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25489