Back to Search Start Over

Problemshed or watershed? Participatory modeling towards IWRM in North Ghana

Authors :
William's Daré
Aaron Aduna
Jean-Philippe Venot
Christophe Le Page
Gestion de l'Eau, Acteurs, Usages (UMR G-EAU)
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-AgroParisTech-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro)
Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)
Gestion des ressources renouvelables et environnement (UPR GREEN)
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)
Département Environnements et Sociétés (Cirad-ES)
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-AgroParisTech-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)
Source :
Water (Switzerland) 10 (2018) 6, Water, Water, MDPI, 2018, 10 (6), p. art. 721 [23 p.]. ⟨10.3390/w10060721⟩, Water (Switzerland), 10(6), Volume 10, Issue 6, Water, Vol 10, Iss 6, p 721 (2018)
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

This paper is a reflexive analysis of a three-year participatory water research project conducted in the Upper East Region (UER) of Ghana, whose explicit objective was to initiate a multi-level dialogue to support the national Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) policy framework. The transdisciplinary team adopted the Companion Modeling approach (ComMod), using role-playing games and a computerized agent-based model to support the identification of a problemshed centered on issues of river bank cultivation, erosion, and flooding, and initiate a multi-level dialogue on ways that this problemshed could be tackled. On the basis of this experience, we identify three key criteria for transdisciplinary research to support innovative water governance: (1) the iterative adaptation of tools and facilitation techniques based on feedback from participants<br />(2) a common understanding of the objectives pursued and the approach used among researchers, who need to explicit their posture, and crucially<br />(3) the co-identification of a problemshed that diverse stakeholders are interested in tackling. Finally, we argue that the context in which research is funded and conducted in the development sector constitutes a challenge for researchers to be &ldquo<br />participants like any other&rdquo<br />in the projects they coordinate, which constitutes a barrier to true transdisciplinarity.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20734441
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Water (Switzerland) 10 (2018) 6, Water, Water, MDPI, 2018, 10 (6), p. art. 721 [23 p.]. ⟨10.3390/w10060721⟩, Water (Switzerland), 10(6), Volume 10, Issue 6, Water, Vol 10, Iss 6, p 721 (2018)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....42289683e9c3bc343ba67d47947479db