Back to Search Start Over

The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) Randomized Controlled Trial: Phase 1 Results on Dynamics of Early Intervention With Remote Monitoring

Authors :
Giuseppe, Boriani
Antoine, Da Costa
Renato Pietro, Ricci
Aurelio, Quesada
Stefano, Favale
Saverio, Iacopino
Francesco, Romeo
Arnaldo, Risi
Lorenza, Mangoni di S Stefano
Xavier, Navarro
Mauro, Biffi
Massimo, Santini
Haran, Burri
E, Zima
Giuseppe Boriani
Antoine Da Costa
Renato Pietro Ricci
Aurelio Quesada
Stefano Favale
Saverio Iacopino
Francesco Romeo
Arnaldo Risi
Lorenza Mangoni di S Stefano
Xavier Navarro
Mauro Biffi
Massimo Santini
Haran Burri
Source :
Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 15, No 8 (2013) P. e167, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol 15, Iss 8, p e167 (2013)
Publication Year :
2013
Publisher :
JMIR Publications Inc., 2013.

Abstract

BackgroundRemote monitoring (RM) in patients with advanced heart failure and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) may reduce delays in clinical decisions by transmitting automatic alerts. However, this strategy has never been tested specifically in this patient population, with alerts for lung fluid overload, and in a European setting. ObjectiveThe main objective of Phase 1 (presented here) is to evaluate if RM strategy is able to reduce time from device-detected events to clinical decisions. MethodsIn this multicenter randomized controlled trial, patients with moderate to severe heart failure implanted with CRT-D devices were randomized to a Remote group (with remote follow-up and wireless automatic alerts) or to a Control group (with standard follow-up without alerts). The primary endpoint of Phase 1 was the delay between an alert event and clinical decisions related to the event in the first 154 enrolled patients followed for 1 year. ResultsThe median delay from device-detected events to clinical decisions was considerably shorter in the Remote group compared to the Control group: 2 (25th-75th percentile, 1-4) days vs 29 (25th-75th percentile, 3-51) days respectively, P=.004. In-hospital visits were reduced in the Remote group (2.0 visits/patient/year vs 3.2 visits/patient/year in the Control group, 37.5% relative reduction, P

Details

ISSN :
14388871
Volume :
15
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....4227994e0b11e233818e8b2cfb0b03de
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2608