Back to Search Start Over

A translation and preliminary validation of the Dutch Wound-QoL questionnaire

Authors :
Catherine van Montfrans
Toni Maria Klein
Christine Blome
Tuong-Vi Nguyen
Audrey M. Meulendijks
Stella F. Amesz
Petrie F. Roodbol
Dermatology
Health Psychology Research (HPR)
Lifelong Learning, Education & Assessment Research Network (LEARN)
Source :
BMC Dermatology, 20(1):5. BioMed Central Ltd., BMC Dermatology, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2020), Jama dermatology, 20(1):5. AMER MEDICAL ASSOC, BMC Dermatology
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Research Square Platform LLC, 2020.

Abstract

Background Chronic wounds have a major impact on patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Therefore, measuring HRQoL is an indispensable part of the treatment of patients with chronic wounds. The aim of this study was to translate and validate the Wound-QoL, a wound-specific HRQoL questionnaire, in a Dutch population. Methods The Wound-QoL was translated into Dutch according to the international standards. Patients with chronic wounds were asked to complete questionnaires at baseline (T0) and after six weeks (T1), including Wound-QoL, EQ-5D-3L (a generic questionnaire to measure HRQoL) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) measuring wound pain. If patients were not able to complete the questionnaire by themselves, it was read out to them by a nurse. Further data were obtained from medical records. Results Of the 120 patients included, 64 (53.3%) completed the questionnaire by themselves. To 55 patients (45.8%), the questionnaire was read out. The internal consistency of the Wound-QoL global score was high at both time points (T0: Cronbach’s α = 0.89, T1: Cronbach’s α = 0.92). The item selectivity for global score ranged from r = 0.25 to r = 0.77 at T0 and from r = 0.40 to r = 0.79 at T1. Overall, the self-completion and read-out subgroups showed similar internal consistency and item selectivity scores. With regard to convergent validity, significant correlations were found between Wound-QoL and EQ-5D-3L (T0: r = − 0.45, p p p = 0.012, T1: r = 0.37, p = 0.001) at both time points. Responsiveness analyses showed significant correlations between changes in Wound-QoL and changes in EQ-5D-3L (r = − 0.37, p p = 0.044) and wound size (r = 0.24, p = 0.013). The self-completion and read-out subgroups showed differences in convergent validity and responsiveness. Conclusions The results indicate that the Dutch version of the Wound-QoL has positive psychometric properties. However, more research is needed to further explore the differences between self-completed and read-out questionnaires.

Details

ISSN :
14715945
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BMC Dermatology, 20(1):5. BioMed Central Ltd., BMC Dermatology, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2020), Jama dermatology, 20(1):5. AMER MEDICAL ASSOC, BMC Dermatology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....41ae947cf2d7624707bd03c8dcc8cd2c