Back to Search Start Over

Association of prestroke metformin use, stroke severity, and thrombolysis outcome

Authors :
Sixtine Gilliot
Hebun Erdur
Christian H. Nolte
Paul J. Nederkoorn
Mauro Magoni
Christian Hametner
Andrea Zini
Patrik Michel
Pierre Seners
Michael J Scherrer
Laura P. Westphal
Ashraf Eskandari
Jonathan M. Coutinho
Sami Curtze
Yannick Béjot
Nicolas Martinez-Majander
Céline Brenière
Georg Kägi
Adrien E. Groot
Didier Leys
Alexandros A Polymeris
Laura Vandelli
Ulrike Held
Alessandro Pezzini
Stefan T. Engelter
Andreas R. Luft
Jan F. Scheitz
Marcel Arnold
Marjaana Tiainen
Roni Widmer
Klaus Steigmiller
Susanne Wegener
Peter A. Ringleb
Christopher Traenka
Mirjam Rachel Heldner
Visnja Padjen
Dejana R. Jovanović
Turgut Tatlisumak
Guillaume Turc
Henrik Gensicke
University of Zurich
Neurology
ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes
ANS - Neurovascular Disorders
Graduate School
ACS - Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences
Source :
Neurology, 95(4), e362-e373. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2020.

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate whether pretreatment with metformin (MET) is associated with less stroke severity and better outcome after IV thrombolysis (IVT), we analyzed a cohort of 1,919 patients with stroke with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a multicenter exploratory analysis.MethodsData from patients with diabetes and ischemic stroke treated with IVT were collected within the European Thrombolysis in Ischemic Stroke Patients (TRISP) collaboration. We applied propensity score matching (PSM) to obtain balanced baseline characteristics of patients treated with and without MET.ResultsOf 1,919 patients with stroke with type 2 diabetes who underwent IVT, 757 (39%) had received MET before stroke (MET+), whereas 1,162 (61%) had not (MET−). MET+ patients were younger with a male preponderance. Hypercholesterolemia and pretreatment with statins, antiplatelets, or antihypertensives were more common in the MET+ group. After PSM, the 2 groups were well balanced with respect to demographic and clinical aspects. Stroke severity on admission (NIH Stroke Scale 10.0 ± 6.7 vs 11.3 ± 6.5), 3-month degree of independence on modified Rankin Scale (2 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.0–4.0] vs 3 [IQR 1.0–4.0]), as well as mortality (12.5% vs 18%) were significantly lower in the MET+ group. The frequency of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages did not differ between groups. HbA1c levels were well-balanced between the groups.ConclusionsPatients with stroke and diabetes on treatment with MET receiving IVT had less severe strokes on admission and a better functional outcome at 3 months. This suggests a protective effect of MET resulting in less severe strokes as well as beneficial thrombolysis outcome.

Details

ISSN :
1526632X and 00283878
Volume :
95
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Neurology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....41a92354e90d03aefcfc1b770a9a0b26