Back to Search Start Over

Rate of axial growth after congenital cataract surgery

Authors :
Abhay R. Vasavada
Shetal M. Raj
Bharti R. Nihalani
Source :
American Journal of Ophthalmology. 138:915-924
Publication Year :
2004
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2004.

Abstract

To evaluate the rate of axial growth after congenital cataract surgery.Prospective observational case series.Rate of axial growth of 158 eyes (79 children10 years) undergoing surgery was correlated with age at surgery, laterality, and visual axis obscuration. After measuring axial length (AL) at each follow-up, the mean AL was calculated, adding the AL of all eyes divided by their total number. Rate of axial growth is the percentage difference between preoperative mean AL and mean AL at last follow up. The temporal profile of RAG is the difference between two consecutive mean ALs with respect to the previous reading. The follow-up period was 58.96 +/- 2.02 months. The student' paired t test and independent sample t test were applied. The main outcome measure was RAG.Rate of axial growth in children operated ator = 1 year (23.5%) was significantly higher than in those ator = 3 years (4.8%; P = .0001, confidence interval [CI] 1.05-3.2) and ator = 10 years (4.3%; P = .0001, CI 1.3-3.1). In children operated ator = 1 year, temporal profile of RAG was higher in the first 2 years after surgery. Rate of axial growth was higher in patients with unilateral pseudophakia ator = 1 year (25.53%) than in age-matched patients with bilateral pseudophakia (18.50%; P = .001, CI -13 to -0.2). Rate of axial growth was negligible in children with visual axis obscuration in any group.Rate of axial growth is higher in childrenor = 1 year and increases until the second year after surgery. Unilateral pseudophakia revealed accelerated growth compared with bilateral pseudophakia. Visual axis obscuration does not influence rate of axial growth.

Details

ISSN :
00029394
Volume :
138
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....4197f4126accafaedf3ceef2984a2a47
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.06.068