Back to Search
Start Over
Blastocyst versus cleavage transfers: who benefits?
- Source :
- Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 305:749-756
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021.
-
Abstract
- This retrospective cohort study determined the relative efficacy of blastocyst and cleavage-stage transfers in patients with differing numbers of zygotes. A total of 1116 women whose embryo transfers were planned independently of patient characteristics were included. Cleavage-stage (D3) and blastocyst-stage (D5) transfer outcomes were analyzed per number of zygotes. The D5 group included transfer cancellations as the intention-to-treat population. The effect of the embryo transfer date on the clinical outcomes (clinical pregnancy and implantation rates) was analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Among the patients, 584 and 532 underwent D3 and D5 embryo transfers, respectively. The clinical pregnancy rates were significantly higher in D5 patients with ≥ 6 zygotes (25.7% vs 48.3%). The multivariate logistic regression analysis for clinical pregnancy did not show significant differences between the blastocyst and cleavage-stage transfers in patients with ≤ 5 zygotes (0.874 [0.635-1.204]). Compared to the cleavage-stage, blastocyst-stage transfers for patients with ≥ 6 zygotes resulted in a three-fold increase in clinical pregnancy rates (3.122 [1.797-5.425]). Blastocyst transfers were not inferior to cleavage-stage embryo transfers among patients with few zygotes and were preferable for patients with several zygotes.
- Subjects :
- Pregnancy Rate
Cleavage Stage, Ovum
Population
Logistic regression
Cleavage (embryo)
Andrology
Pregnancy
Humans
Medicine
Blastocyst
education
Retrospective Studies
education.field_of_study
Zygote
business.industry
Pregnancy Outcome
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Retrospective cohort study
Embryo
General Medicine
Embryo Transfer
Embryo transfer
medicine.anatomical_structure
embryonic structures
Female
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14320711 and 09320067
- Volume :
- 305
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....3fc5981ca675349a16bb9dea4d3646b5
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06224-2