Back to Search Start Over

One-year follow-up of a therapeutic lifestyle intervention targeting cardiovascular disease risk

Authors :
Holly Kennedy-Symonds
Nadine Loewen
Joel Singer
Bonnie McCoy
Brian McGowan
Andrew V. Wister
Source :
Canadian Medical Association Journal. 177:859-865
Publication Year :
2007
Publisher :
CMA Joule Inc., 2007.

Abstract

In this study, we tested the efficacy of a low-intensity lifestyle intervention aimed at reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease among mid-life individuals.We conducted a randomized controlled trial in which participants were randomly assigned either to receive a health report card with counselling (from a Telehealth nurse) on smoking, exercise, nutrition and stress or to receive usual care. The patients were divided into 2 groups on the basis of risk: the primary prevention group, with a Framingham risk score of 10% or higher (intervention, n = 157; control, n = 158), and the secondary prevention group, who had a diagnosis of coronary artery disease (intervention, n = 153; control, n = 143). The primary outcome was a change in the Framingham global risk score between baseline and 1-year follow-up. Data were analyzed separately for the 2 prevention groups using an intention-to-treat analysis controlling for covariates.Within the primary prevention group, there were statistically significant changes for the treatment group relative to the controls, from baseline to year 1, in Framingham score (intervention, -3.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) -3.98 to -2.22]; control, -1.30 [95% CI -2.18 to -0.42]; p0.01) and scores for total cholesterol (intervention, -0.41 [95% CI -0.59 to -0.23]; control, -0.14 [95% CI -0.32 to 0.04]; p0.05), systolic blood pressure (intervention, -7.49 [95% CI -9.97 to -5.01]; control, -3.58 [95% CI -6.08 to -1.08]; p0.05), nutrition level (intervention, 0.30 [95% CI 0.13 to 0.47]; control, -0.05 [95% CI -0.22 to 0.12]; p0.01), and health confidence (intervention, 0.20 [95% CI 0.09 to 0.31]; control, 0.04 [95% CI -0.07 to 0.15]; p0.05), with adjustment for covariates. No significant changes in outcome variables were found for the secondary prevention group.We found evidence for the efficacy of an intervention addressing multiple risk factors for primary prevention at 1 year using Framingham risk score report cards and telephone counselling. (Requirement for clinical trial registration waived [enrolment completed before requirement became applicable].).

Details

ISSN :
14882329 and 08203946
Volume :
177
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Canadian Medical Association Journal
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3f99ecc42baf3b4edbbf62914f02ddef
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.061059