Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of the human-baited double net trap with the human landing catch for Aedes albopictus monitoring in Shanghai, China
- Source :
- Parasites & Vectors, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2018), Parasites & Vectors
- Publication Year :
- 2018
- Publisher :
- BMC, 2018.
-
Abstract
- Background Human landing catch (HLC) is the most efficient method for Aedes monitoring, but it is not ethical due to its high risk of human exposure to pathogens. We designed trials to assess the performance of an alternative human-baited double net trap (HDN) for field Aedes albopictus monitoring compared with the standard HLC. Methods Outdoor HDN and HLC catches were conducted simultaneously at 15 field sites on two sunny days in mid-July and August. The tests were performed 3 h apart: an early morning period (7:30–8:30 h), a pre-sunset period (16:30–17:30 h) and a post-sunset period (18:30–19:30 h). A total of 90 comparisons were made between the two methods. Field comparisons were designed to minimize half-hour bias and human-bait attraction bias. Results Two mosquito species were collected by HDN and HLC, with the predominated species being Ae. albopictus (HDN: n = 1325, 97.35% of total; HLC: n = 531, 92.51% of total). A small proportion were adults of the Culex pipiens complex (HDN: n = 36, 2.65% of total; HLC: n = 43, 7.49% of total). Although the mean Ae. albopictus catch per hour of HLC was significantly higher than HDN (14.72 vs 5.90 per h, t (178) = 3.151, P = 0.003), there were significant positive spatial and temporal correlations between HLC and HDN for Ae. albopictus sampling among different sites and hours (r (90) = 0.785, P < 0.001; r (90) = 0.785, P < 0.001). Both methods proved that Ae. albopictus was most active during the hours before sunset and least active after sunset. No significant variation was observed in Ae. albopictus catch size of HDN between groups of more attractive and less attractive humans (3.38 vs 2.51 per 30 min, t (88) = 1.283, P = 0.201). Conclusions With moderate sampling efficiency, significantly positive spatial correlation with HLC, and less human-bait attraction bias, HDN appears to be a safer alternative to HLC for Ae. albopictus monitoring in Shanghai. With mosquito activity peaking in the pre-sunset hours, Ae. albopictus catches of HDN should be performed in the hours before dark. The trap design could be improved to make it more portable and easier for field operation.
- Subjects :
- 0106 biological sciences
Male
Veterinary medicine
China
Aedes albopictus
Mosquito Control
Sampling efficiency
030231 tropical medicine
Culex pipiens complex
01 natural sciences
lcsh:Infectious and parasitic diseases
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Aedes
Anopheles
Animals
Humans
Shanghai china
lcsh:RC109-216
Cities
Morning
biology
Research
Data Collection
biology.organism_classification
Human landing catch (HLC)
010602 entomology
Culex
Infectious Diseases
Human exposure
Odorants
Human-baited double net trap (HDN)
Parasitology
Downtown Shanghai
Entomology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 17563305
- Volume :
- 11
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Parasites & Vectors
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....3f99e1bcb8bde36232f2d198a1777fc1
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-3053-8