Back to Search Start Over

Concomitant anti-platelet therapy in warfarin-treated patients undergoing cardiac rhythm device implantation: A secondary analysis of the BRUISE CONTROL trial

Authors :
Riccardo Proietti
Richard Leather
M. Sturmer
Andrew D. Krahn
Bruise Control Investigators
Christopher S. Simpson
Satish Toal
Kamran Ahmad
Tiago Luiz Luz Leiria
Claus Rinne
Katherine M. Kavanagh
George A. Wells
Atul Verma
Vidal Essebag
Benoit Coutu
Eugene Crystal
Ahmed AlTurki
Felix Ayala-Paredes
Colette M. Seifer
David H. Birnie
John L. Sapp
Jeff S. Healey
Source :
International journal of cardiology. 288
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background Anti-platelet therapy is commonly used in patients receiving oral anticoagulation and may increase bleeding risk among patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) surgery. We sought to determine the proportion of anticoagulated patients who are concomitantly receiving anti-platelet therapy, the associated risk of clinically significant hematoma (CSH), and the proportion of patients in whom anti-platelet usage is guideline-indicated. Methods A secondary analysis of the Bridge or Continue Coumadin for Device Surgery Randomized Controlled Trial (BRUISE CONTROL). Patients who were receiving warfarin, had an annual predicted risk of thromboembolism of ≥5% and were scheduled to undergo non-emergent CIED surgery were randomized to continued warfarin versus heparin bridging. In the current analysis, patients were divided into those receiving anti-platelet therapy and those not receiving anti-platelet therapy. The incidence of CSH was compared in both groups. The proportion of patients on potentially inappropriate and potentially interruptible antiplatelet therapy was estimated. Results All 681 patients enrolled in BRUISE CONTROL were included, of whom 280 received and 401 did not receive anti-platelet therapy. Anti-platelet therapy increased the risk of CSH (relative risk, 1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09 to 2.72; P = 0.02). Of the 280 patients receiving anti-platelet therapy, 97 (34.6%) had no guideline indication for concomitant anti-platelet therapy and an additional 146 (52.1%) were on anti-platelet therapy that could potentially have been interrupted around CIED surgery. Conclusions Concomitant anti-platelet therapy in patients receiving anticoagulation is associated with a significant risk of CSH. The majority of concomitant anti-platelet therapy is potentially inappropriate or interruptible. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: (NCT00800137)

Details

ISSN :
18741754
Volume :
288
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
International journal of cardiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3f2c439defa175dadbe510e16e0bee82