Back to Search Start Over

Interlaboratory Comparison of Assessments of Alzheimer Disease-Related Lesions: A Study of the BrainNet Europe Consortium

Authors :
David Meyronet
Isidro Ferrer
Nenad Bogdanovic
Herbert Budka
Manuel B. Graeber
Nicolas Kopp
Andy King
Maria Pikkarainen
Giorgio Giaccone
Ellen Gelpi
Irina Alafuzoff
Piero Parchi
Safa Al-Sarraj
Dietmar Rudolf Thal
Matthias Preusser
Rivka Ravid
Danielle Seilhean
Istvan Bodi
Hans A. Kretzschmar
Jean Jacques Hauw
Nathalie Streichenberger
Penelope Korkolopoulou
Jeanne E. Bell
Efstratios Patsouris
Thomas Arzberger
Wolfgang Roggendorf
Gabor G. Kovacs
Wouter Kamphorst
Orso Bugiani
Alafuzoff I.
Pikkarainen M.
Al-Sarraj S.
Arzberger T.
Bell J.
Bodi I.
Bogdanovic N.
Budka H.
Bugiani O.
Ferrer I.
Gelpi E.
Giaccone G.
Graeber M.B.
Hauw J.J.
Kamphorst W.
King A.
Kopp N.
Korkolopoulou P.
Kovacs G.G.
Meyronet D.
Parchi P.
Patsouris E.
Preusser M.
Ravid R.
Roggendorf W.
Seilhean D.
Streichenberger N.
Thal D.R.
Kretzschmar H.
Source :
Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology. 65:740-757
Publication Year :
2006
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2006.

Abstract

This interlaboratory study evaluated the reproducibility of the assessments of neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs)-the hallmark lesions of Alzheimer disease-and compared the staining between the BrainNet Europe centers. To reduce the topography-related inconsistencies in assessments, we used a 2-mm tissue microarray (TMA) technique. The TMA block included 42 core samples taken from 21 paraffin blocks. The assessments were done on Bielschowsky and Gallyas silver stains using an immunohistochemical (IHC) method with antibodies directed to beta-amyloid (IHC/Aβ) and hyperphosphorylated tau (IHC/HPtau). The staining quality and the assessments differed between the participants, being most diverse with Bielschowsky (good/acceptable stain in 53% of centers) followed by Gallyas (good/acceptable stain in 57%) and IHC/Aβ (good/acceptable stain in 71%). The most uniform staining quality and assessment was obtained with the IHC/HPtau method (good/acceptable stain in 94% of centers). The neuropathologic diagnostic protocol (Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer Disease, Braak and Braak, and the National Institute of Aging and Reagan [NIA-Reagan] Institute) that was used significantly influenced the agreement, being highest with NIA-Reagan (54%) recommendations. This agreement was improved by visualization of NFTs using the IHC/HPtau method. Therefore, the IHC/HPtau methodology to visualize NFTs and neuropil threads should be considered as a method of choice in a future diagnostic protocol for Alzheimer disease. Copyright © 2006 by the American Association of Neuropathologists, Inc.

Details

ISSN :
15546578 and 00223069
Volume :
65
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3e76b3c032c63e4c15be024612da3d97
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jnen.0000229986.17548.27