Back to Search
Start Over
Do Guideline-Based Indications Result in an Outcome Penalty for Patients With Severe Aortic Regurgitation?
- Source :
- JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, Vol. 12, no. 11 Pt 1, p. 2126-2138 (2019)
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Elsevier, 2019.
-
Abstract
- OBJECTIVES: The present study examines whether improvements have reduced the negative impact of guideline triggers on postoperative outcomes. BACKGROUND: European and American guidelines for the management of severe aortic regurgitation (AR) define the triggers for AR surgery. These triggers are based on the results of studies performed in the 1990s analyzing outcomes of patients who underwent AR surgery in the 1980s. Although these triggers are used to indicate surgery, they have all been associated with poorer postoperative outcomes. In the meantime, innovations in operative techniques, including aortic valve repair, have allowed reducing the risk of surgery. METHODS: A total of 356 consecutive patients undergoing surgical correction of severe AR were included in this study. Among them, 204 were operated on for a Class I, 17 for a Class IIa, 49 for a Class IIb, and 86 without any guideline triggers. Cox proportional hazards regression models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare postoperative outcomes in the different groups. Inverse probability weighing was used to adjust for mismatched baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Adjusted 10-year survival was better among patients without operative triggers (89 ± 4%) or with Class II triggers (85 ± 6%) than in patients with Class I triggers (71 ± 4%, p = 0.010). Similar results were obtained for cardiovascular survival and hospitalizations for heart failure. Spline function analyses indicated that mortality started to increase for left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction 20 to 22 mm/m2. LV end-diastolic dimensions did not influence outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Guideline-based Class I triggers for AR surgery carry major risks for long-term outcomes. This suggests that patients with severe AR should be operated on before the onset of these triggers; that is, at an asymptomatic stage, before LV ejection fraction falls below 55% or LV end-systolic dimensions exceeds 20 to 22 mm/m2.
- Subjects :
- Male
Time Factors
Databases, Factual
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
Severity of Illness Index
Ventricular Function, Left
030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging
0302 clinical medicine
Aortic valve repair
Risk Factors
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Stage (cooking)
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
Ejection fraction
Middle Aged
Progression-Free Survival
Aortic Valve
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Cardiology
Female
Guideline Adherence
medicine.symptom
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
postoperative survival
Aortic Valve Insufficiency
Clinical Decision-Making
aortic valve repair
Regurgitation (circulation)
Risk Assessment
Asymptomatic
Time-to-Treatment
03 medical and health sciences
early surgery
Internal medicine
medicine
Humans
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Survival analysis
Aged
Heart Failure
business.industry
Patient Selection
Hemodynamics
Recovery of Function
Guideline
medicine.disease
aortic regurgitation
Heart failure
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, Vol. 12, no. 11 Pt 1, p. 2126-2138 (2019)
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....3e46ff0f717fbad49bfc923a1a0f7328