Back to Search Start Over

Development of the Informing Relatives Inventory (IRI): Assessing Index Patients' Knowledge, Motivation and Self-Efficacy Regarding the Disclosure of Hereditary Cancer Risk Information to Relatives

Development of the Informing Relatives Inventory (IRI): Assessing Index Patients' Knowledge, Motivation and Self-Efficacy Regarding the Disclosure of Hereditary Cancer Risk Information to Relatives

Authors :
Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes
Fred H. Menko
Rolf H. Sijmons
Cora M. Aalfs
Ellen M. A. Smets
Eveline de Geus
Mathilde G. E. Verdam
Human genetics
CCA - Quality of life
Graduate School
Human Genetics
Medical Psychology
Amsterdam Public Health
Educational Sciences (RICDE, FMG)
Faculteit der Geneeskunde
Guided Treatment in Optimal Selected Cancer Patients (GUTS)
Source :
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22(4), 551-560. Routledge, de Geus, E, Aalfs, C M, Menko, F H, Sijmons, R H, Verdam, M G E, de Haes, H C J M & Smets, E M A 2015, ' Development of the Informing Relatives Inventory (IRI): Assessing Index Patients' Knowledge, Motivation and Self-Efficacy Regarding the Disclosure of Hereditary Cancer Risk Information to Relatives ', International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 551-560 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-014-9455-x, International journal of behavioral medicine, 22(4), 551-560. Routledge, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22(4), 551-560. SPRINGER
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Background: Despite the use of genetic services, counselees do not always share hereditary cancer information with at-risk relatives. Reasons for not informing relatives may be categorized as a lack of: knowledge, motivation, and/or self-efficacy.Purpose: This study aims to develop and test the psychometric properties of the Informing Relatives Inventory, a battery of instruments that intend to measure counselees’ knowledge, motivation, and self-efficacy regarding the disclosure of hereditary cancer risk information to at-risk relatives.Method: Guided by the proposed conceptual framework, existing instruments were selected and new instruments were developed. We tested the instruments’ acceptability, dimensionality, reliability, and criterion-related validity in consecutive index patients visiting the Clinical Genetics department with questions regarding hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer or colon cancer.Results: Data of 211 index patients were included (response rate = 62 %). The Informing Relatives Inventory (IRI) assesses three barriers in disclosure representing seven domains. Instruments assessing index patients’ (positive) motivation and self-efficacy were acceptable and reliable and suggested good criterion-related validity. Psychometric properties of instruments assessing index patients knowledge were disputable. These items were moderately accepted by index patients and the criterion-related validity was weaker.Conclusion: This study presents a first conceptual framework and associated inventory (IRI) that improves insight into index patients’ barriers regarding the disclosure of genetic cancer information to at-risk relatives. Instruments assessing (positive) motivation and self-efficacy proved to be reliable measurements. Measuring index patients knowledge appeared to be more challenging. Further research is necessary to ensure IRI’s dimensionality and sensitivity to change.

Details

ISSN :
10705503
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22(4), 551-560. Routledge, de Geus, E, Aalfs, C M, Menko, F H, Sijmons, R H, Verdam, M G E, de Haes, H C J M & Smets, E M A 2015, ' Development of the Informing Relatives Inventory (IRI): Assessing Index Patients' Knowledge, Motivation and Self-Efficacy Regarding the Disclosure of Hereditary Cancer Risk Information to Relatives ', International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 551-560 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-014-9455-x, International journal of behavioral medicine, 22(4), 551-560. Routledge, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22(4), 551-560. SPRINGER
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3e2508bc6211559ddf5bba20ad086645
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-014-9455-x