Back to Search Start Over

A Belgian Survey on Geriatric Assessment in Oncology Focusing on Large-Scale Implementation and Related Barriers and Facilitators

Authors :
B. Petit
Koen Milisen
Marika Rasschaert
R.E.N. van Rijswijk
K. Vandenborre
Jean-Charles Goeminne
Lore Decoster
Katrien Geboers
Johan Flamaing
Abdelbari Baitar
Pol Specenier
R. Moor
Christian Focan
Frank Cornelis
K. Van Puyvelde
Cindy Kenis
Nathalie Nols
Christine Langenaeken
Jean-Pierre Lobelle
K. Vanoverbeke
Vincent Verschaeve
Philip R. Debruyne
Yves Libert
Godelieve Conings
H. Van den Bulck
Pieter Heeren
Hans Wildiers
Guy Jerusalem
J.-P. Praet
Pascale Cornette
Sylvie Luce
Clinical sciences
Medical Oncology
Laboratory for Medical and Molecular Oncology
Gerontology
Frailty in Ageing
Research in Geriatrics and Gerontology
Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences and Solvay Business School
Source :
The journal of nutrition, health and aging
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to describe a large-scale, Belgian implementation project about geriatric assessment (=GA) in daily oncology practice and to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing GA in this setting. Design / setting / participants: The principal investigator of every participating hospital (n=22) was invited to complete a newly developed questionnaire with closed-and open-ended questions. The closed-ended questions surveyed how GA was implemented. The open-ended questions identified barriers and facilitators for the implementation of GA in daily oncology practice. Descriptive statistics and conventional content analysis were performed as appropriate. Results: Qualifying criteria (e.g. disease status and cancer type) for GA varied substantially between hospitals. Thirteen hospitals (59.1%) succeeded to screen more than half of eligible patients. Most hospitals reported that GA data and follow-up data had been collected in almost all screened patients. Implementing geriatric recommendations and formulating new geriatric recommendations at the time of follow-up are important opportunities for improvement. The majority of identified barriers were organizational, with high workload, lack of time or financial/staffing problems as most cited. The most cited facilitators were all related to collaboration. Conclusion: Interventions to improve the implementation of GA in older patients with cancer need to address a wide range of factors, with organization and collaboration as key elements. All stakeholders, seeking to improve the implementation of GA in older patients with cancer, should consider and address the identified barriers and facilitators.

Details

ISSN :
17604788 and 12797707
Volume :
20
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The journal of nutrition, healthaging
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3e19c8be4dd0c57fbf7b9f3937830c64