Back to Search Start Over

Early response evaluation using F-18-FDG-PET/CT does not influence management of patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) treated with palliative intent

Authors :
Sheima Farag
Neeltje Steeghs
Nikki S. IJzerman
Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
An K.L. Reyners
Anne I.J. Arens
Ingrid M.E. Desar
Hans Gelderblom
Dirk J. Grünhagen
Matthijs P.M. Houdijk
Targeted Gynaecologic Oncology (TARGON)
Guided Treatment in Optimal Selected Cancer Patients (GUTS)
Surgery
Medical Oncology
Biomedical Photonic Imaging
Source :
Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear Medicine, 60, 06, pp. 411-416, Nuklearmedizin-Nuclear medicine, 60(6), 411-416. GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG, Nuclear Medicine-Nuklearmedizin, 60(6), 411-416. Georg Thieme Verlag, Nuklearmedizin, 60(06), 411-416. Schattauer GmbH, Nuclear Medicine, 60(06), 411-416. GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG, Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear Medicine, 60, 411-416
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Aim The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of 18F-FDG-PET/CT on treatment decision making in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients. Methods This study retrospectively evaluated 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans to monitor response of metastatic GIST patients treated with palliative intent. Data from the Dutch GIST Registry was used. Early scans (10 weeks after start of treatment) were scored on the impact in change of treatment. Results Sixty-one PET/CT scans were performed for treatment evaluation in 39 patients with metastatic GIST of which 36 were early scans and 25 were late scans. Early PET/CT scans led to a change in management in 5.6% of patients and late PET/CT scans led to a change in management in 56% of patients. Change in management was more often seen after scans with lack of metabolic response (48% vs. 11% in scans with metabolic response, p=0.002). Neither metabolic response nor change in treatment were more often seen in patients with KIT mutations compared to patients with non-KIT mutations (metabolic response 65% KIT vs. 46% non-KIT, p=0.33, and change in management 28% KIT vs. 21% non-KIT, p=0.74). Conclusion 18F-FDG-PET/CT is not recommended for early response evaluation in an unselected patient population with metastatic GIST, since it does not influence treatment decisions. 18F-FDG-PET/CT, however, can be useful for late response assessment, especially in case of indeterminate CT results.

Details

ISSN :
00295566
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear Medicine, 60, 06, pp. 411-416, Nuklearmedizin-Nuclear medicine, 60(6), 411-416. GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG, Nuclear Medicine-Nuklearmedizin, 60(6), 411-416. Georg Thieme Verlag, Nuklearmedizin, 60(06), 411-416. Schattauer GmbH, Nuclear Medicine, 60(06), 411-416. GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG, Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear Medicine, 60, 411-416
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3e05f6f857a4de8f8baea46e380e3926