Back to Search Start Over

Validation of SmartVA using conventional autopsy: A study of adult deaths in Brazil

Authors :
Ana Maria de Oliveira Ramos
Ian Riley
Denise Souza de Meira Mota
Patrícia Ismael de Carvalho
Cátia Martinez Minto
Luiz Fernando Ferraz da Silva
John D. Hart
Deirdre McLaughlin
Bárbara Araújo Silva de Azevedo
Conceição Maria de Oliveira
Lucia Pereira Barroso
Paulo Hilário Nascimento Saldiva
Tim Adair
Luiz Alberto Amador Pereira
Sandra Valongueiro
Paulo Afonso de André
Tânia Maria da Silva Bezerra
Ana Luiza Bierrenbach
José Ricardo Alves de Lima
Carmen Diva Saldiva de André
Maria Bernadete de Cerqueira Antunes
Sérgio Parente Costa
Elisabeth Barboza França
Maria de Fátima Marinho de Souza
Source :
The Lancet Regional Health. Americas, Vol 5, Iss, Pp 100081-(2022), Repositório Institucional da USP (Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), instacron:USP
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2022.

Abstract

Summary Background Accurate cause of death data are essential to guide health policy. However, mortality surveillance is limited in many low-income countries. In such settings, verbal autopsy (VA) is increasingly used to provide population-level cause of death data. VAs are now widely interpreted using the automated algorithms SmartVA and InterVA. Here we use conventional autopsy as the gold standard to validate SmartVA methodology. Methods This study included adult deaths from natural causes in Sao Paulo and Recife for which conventional autopsy was indicated. VA was conducted with a relative of the deceased using an amended version of the SmartVA instrument to suit the local context. Causes of death from VA were produced using the SmartVA-Analyze program. Physician coded verbal autopsy (PCVA), conducted on the same questionnaires, and Global Burden of Disease Study data were used as additional comparators. Cause of death data were grouped into 10 broad causes for the validation due to the real-world utility of VA lying in identifying broad population cause of death patterns. Findings The study included 2,060 deaths in Sao Paulo and 1,079 in Recife. The cause specific mortality fractions (CSMFs) estimated using SmartVA were broadly similar to conventional autopsy for: cardiovascular diseases (46.8% vs 54.0%, respectively), cancers (10.6% vs 11.4%), infections (7.0% vs 10.4%) and chronic respiratory disease (4.1% vs 3.7%), causes accounting for 76.1% of the autopsy dataset. The SmartVA CSMF estimates were lower than autopsy for “Other NCDs” (7.8% vs 14.6%) and higher for diabetes (13.0% vs 6.6%). CSMF accuracy of SmartVA compared to autopsy was 84.5%. CSMF accuracy for PCVA was 93.0%. Interpretation The results suggest that SmartVA can, with reasonable accuracy, predict the broad cause of death groups important to assess a population's epidemiological transition. VA remains a useful tool for understanding causes of death where medical certification is not possible.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2667193X
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Lancet Regional Health. Americas, Vol 5, Iss, Pp 100081-(2022), Repositório Institucional da USP (Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), instacron:USP
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3de86faf0b103407153b9f45df8d8379