Back to Search
Start Over
Calibrating the Davis–Chandrasekhar–Fermi Method with Numerical Simulations: Uncertainties in Estimating the Magnetic Field Strength from Statistics of Field Orientations
- Source :
- The Astrophysical Journal, The Astrophysical Journal, 2021, 919 (2), pp.79. ⟨10.3847/1538-4357/ac0cec⟩, The Astrophysical Journal, American Astronomical Society, 2021, 919 (2), pp.79. ⟨10.3847/1538-4357/ac0cec⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- HAL CCSD, 2021.
-
Abstract
- The Davis-Chandrasekhar-Fermi (DCF) method is widely used to indirectly estimate the magnetic field strength from the plane-of-sky field orientation. In this work, we present a set of 3D MHD simulations and synthetic polarization images using radiative transfer of clustered massive star-forming regions. We apply the DCF method on the synthetic polarization maps to investigate its reliability in high-density molecular clumps and dense cores where self-gravity is significant. We investigate the validity of the assumptions of the DCF method step by step and compare the model and estimated field strength to derive the correction factors for the estimated uniform and total (rms) magnetic field strength at clump and core scales. The correction factors in different situations are catalogued. We find the DCF method works well in strong field cases. However, the magnetic field strength in weak field cases could be significantly overestimated by the DCF method when the turbulent magnetic energy is smaller than the turbulent kinetic energy. We investigate the accuracy of the angular dispersion function (ADF, a modified DCF method) method on the effects that may affect the measured angular dispersion and find that the ADF method correctly accounts for the ordered field structure, the beam-smoothing, and the interferometric filtering, but may not be applicable to account for the signal integration along the line of sight in most cases. Our results suggest that the DCF methods should be avoided to be applied below $\sim$0.1 pc scales if the effect of line-of-sight signal integration is not properly addressed.<br />40 pages, 24 figures, accepted by ApJ
- Subjects :
- Physics
Magnetic energy
Field (physics)
010308 nuclear & particles physics
FOS: Physical sciences
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Field strength
Polarization (waves)
01 natural sciences
Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies
Computational physics
Magnetic field
Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
Space and Planetary Science
[SDU]Sciences of the Universe [physics]
Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)
0103 physical sciences
Turbulence kinetic energy
Radiative transfer
Magnetohydrodynamics
Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM)
010303 astronomy & astrophysics
Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR)
ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0004637X and 15384357
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The Astrophysical Journal, The Astrophysical Journal, 2021, 919 (2), pp.79. ⟨10.3847/1538-4357/ac0cec⟩, The Astrophysical Journal, American Astronomical Society, 2021, 919 (2), pp.79. ⟨10.3847/1538-4357/ac0cec⟩
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....3de847ff3d03b31a43e43c2030c066d7
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac0cec⟩