Back to Search Start Over

Early Outcome of Bilateral versus Single Internal Mammary Artery Grafting in the Elderly

Authors :
Aamer Ahmed
Daniel Reichart
Aniello Pappalardo
Antonino S. Rubino
Daniele Maselli
Marco Zanobini
Saverio Nardella
Sidney Chocron
Giuseppe Santarpino
Fausto Biancari
Paola D'Errigo
Francesco Santini
Theodor Fischlein
Juhani Airaksinen
Francesco Onorati
Tuomas Tauriainen
Antonio Salsano
Vito G. Ruggieri
Stefano Rosato
Marisa De Feo
Andrea Perrotti
Giuseppe Gatti
Giuseppe Faggian
Helmut Gulbins
Carmelo Mignosa
Peter Svenarud
Francesco Nicolini
Karl Bounader
Riccardo Gherli
Matteo Saccocci
Ilaria Franzese
Magnus Dalén
Rubino, Antonino S
Gatti, Giuseppe
Reichart, Daniel
Tauriainen, Tuoma
De Feo, Marisa
Onorati, Francesco
Pappalardo, Aniello
Chocron, Sidney
Gulbins, Helmut
Dalén, Magnu
Svenarud, Peter
Faggian, Giuseppe
Franzese, Ilaria
Santarpino, Giuseppe
Fischlein, Theodor
Maselli, Daniele
Nardella, Saverio
Gherli, Riccardo
Ahmed, Aamer
Santini, Francesco
Salsano, Antonio
Nicolini, Francesco
Zanobini, Marco
Saccocci, Matteo
Ruggieri, Vito G
Bounader, Karl
Mignosa, Carmelo
D'Errigo, Paola
Rosato, Stefano
Airaksinen, Juhani
Perrotti, Andrea
Biancari, Fausto
Source :
Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 105(6):1717-1723
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafting is increasingly used in the elderly without evidence of its risks or benefits compared to single internal mammary artery (SIMA) grafting. Background. Bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafting is increasingly used in elderly patients without evidence of its risks or benefits compared with single internal mammary artery (SIMA) grafting.Methods. In all, 2,899 patients aged 70 years or older (855 [29.5%] underwent BIMA grafting) operated on from January 2015 to December 2016 and included in the prospective multicenter Outcome After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (E-CABG) study were considered in this analysis.Results. One-to-one propensity matching resulted in 804 pairs with similar preoperative risk profile. Propensity score matched analysis showed that BIMA grafting was associated with a nonstatistically significant increased risk of inhospital death (2.7% versus 1.6%, p = 0.117). The BIMA grafting cohort had a significantly increased risk of any sternal wound infection (7.7% versus 5.1%, p = 0.031) as well as higher risk of deep sternal wound infection/mediastinitis (4.0% versus 2.2%, p = 0.048). The BIMA grafting cohort required more frequently extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (1.0% versus 0.1%, p = 0.02), and the intensive care unit stay (mean 3.6 versus 2.6 days, p < 0.001) and inhospital stay (mean 11.3 versus 10.0 days, p < 0.001) were significantly longer compared with the SIMA grafting cohort. Test for interaction showed that urgent operation in patients undergoing BIMA grafting was associated with higher risk of inhospital death (5.6% versus 1.3%, p = 0.009).Conclusions. Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting in elderly patients seems to be associated with a worse early outcome compared with SIMA grafting, particularly in patients undergoing urgent operation. Until more conclusive results are gathered, BIMA grafting should be reserved only for elderly patients with stable coronary artery disease, without significant baseline comorbidities and with long life expectancy. (C) 2018 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00034975
Volume :
105
Issue :
6
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3dc2bed1e843c9e54ba92111c477b017