Back to Search Start Over

18 F-FDG-PET dissemination features in diffuse large B cell lymphoma are predictive of outcome

Authors :
Olivier Casasnovas
Franck Morschhauser
Jérôme Clerc
Christophe Nioche
Anne-Ségolène Cottereau
Anne-Sophie Dirand
Michel Meignan
Irène Buvat
UNIROUEN - UFR Santé (UNIROUEN UFR Santé)
Université de Rouen Normandie (UNIROUEN)
Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)
Imagerie Moléculaire in Vivo (IMIV - U1023 - ERL9218)
Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot (SHFJ)
Université Paris-Saclay-Direction de Recherche Fondamentale (CEA) (DRF (CEA))
Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris-Saclay-Direction de Recherche Fondamentale (CEA) (DRF (CEA))
Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Département de radiothérapie [Gustave Roussy]
Institut Gustave Roussy (IGR)
Hôpital Cochin [AP-HP]
Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)
Service d'hématologie
Hôpital Claude Huriez [Lille]
CHU Lille-CHU Lille-Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Lille] (CHRU Lille)
Hôpital du Bocage
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon - Hôpital François Mitterrand (CHU Dijon)
Hôpital Henri Mondor
Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpital Henri Mondor-Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12)
Buvat, Irène
Direction de Recherche Fondamentale (CEA) (DRF (CEA))
Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Centre Laser de l'Université Paris Sud (CLUPS)
Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)
Service de Médecine Nucléaire, Hôpital Cochin, Paris
Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 (GRITA)
Université de Lille-Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Lille] (CHRU Lille)
Service d'Hématologie Clinique (CHU de Dijon)
Service de médecine nucléaire [Créteil]
Source :
Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2020, 61 (1), pp.40-45. ⟨10.2967/jnumed.119.229450⟩, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2020, 61 (1), pp.40-45. ⟨10.2967/jnumed.119.229450⟩, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2020, pp.jnumed.119.229450. ⟨10.2967/jnumed.119.229450⟩, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2020, pp.jnumed.119.229450. ⟨10.2967/jnumed.119.229450⟩, J Nucl Med
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2020.

Abstract

International audience; We assessed the predictive value of new radiomic features characterizing lesion dissemination in baseline 18 F-FDG PET and tested whether combining them with baseline metabolic tumor volume (MTV) could improve prediction of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Methods: From the LNH073B trial (NCT00498043), patients with advancedstage DLCBL and 18 F-FDG PET/CT images available for review were selected. MTV and several radiomic features, including the distance between the 2 lesions that were farthest apart (Dmax patient), were calculated. Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff for quantitative variables, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed. Results: With a median age of 46 y, 95 patients were enrolled, half of them treated with R-CHOP biweekly (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) and the other half with R-ACVBP (rituximab, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, and prednisone), with no significant impact on outcome. Median MTV and Dmax patient were 375 cm 3 and 45 cm, respectively. The median follow-up was 44 mo. High MTV and Dmax patient were adverse factors for PFS (P 5 0.027 and P 5 0.0003, respectively) and for OS (P 5 0.0007 and P 5 0.0095, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only Dmax patient was significantly associated with PFS (P 5 0.0014) whereas both factors remained significant for OS (P 5 0.037 and P 5 0.0029, respectively). Combining MTV (.384 cm 3) and Dmax patient (.58 cm) yielded 3 risk groups for PFS (P 5 0.0003) and OS (P 5 0.0011): high with 2 adverse factors (4-y PFS and OS of 50% and 53%, respectively, n 5 18), low with no adverse factor (94% and 97%, n 5 36), and an intermediate category with 1 adverse factor (73% and 88%, n 5 41). Conclusion: Combining MTV with a parameter reflecting the tumor burden dissemination further improves DLBCL patient risk stratification at staging.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01615505 and 15355667
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2020, 61 (1), pp.40-45. ⟨10.2967/jnumed.119.229450⟩, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2020, 61 (1), pp.40-45. ⟨10.2967/jnumed.119.229450⟩, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2020, pp.jnumed.119.229450. ⟨10.2967/jnumed.119.229450⟩, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2020, pp.jnumed.119.229450. ⟨10.2967/jnumed.119.229450⟩, J Nucl Med
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3dabe8de3a37016a1bdeba6fb64c743f