Back to Search Start Over

Are well-studied marine biodiversity hotspots still blackspots for animal barcoding?

Authors :
Loretta Lattanzi
Michèle Leduc
F. Bertasi
Federica Costantini
Barbara Mikac
Olivier De Clerck
Marco Abbiati
Anne Chenuil
María Capa
Laetitia Plaisance
Kenan O. Matterson
Ana Riesgo
Daniel Martin
Giorgio Bavestrello
José Miguel Gutiérrez
Eva Turicchia
Massimo Ponti
Marzia Bo
Andrea Waeschenbach
Francesco Mugnai
Emese Meglécz
Owen S. Wangensteen
Marina Antonia Colangelo
Mugnai, Francesco
Meglécz, Emese
Abbiati, Marco
Bavestrello, Giorgio
Bertasi, Fabio
Bo, Marzia
Capa, María
Chenuil, Anne
Colangelo, Marina Antonia
De Clerck, Olivier
Gutiérrez, José Miguel
Lattanzi, Loretta
Leduc, Michèle
Martin, Daniel
Matterson, Kenan Oguz
Mikac, Barbara
Plaisance, Laetitia
Ponti, Massimo
Riesgo, Ana
Rossi, Vincent
Turicchia, Eva
Waeschenbach, Andrea
Wangensteen, Owen S.
Costantini, Federica
University of Bologna
Institut méditerranéen de biodiversité et d'écologie marine et continentale (IMBE)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de recherche pour le développement [IRD] : UMR237-Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Avignon Université (AU)
Consorzio Nazionale Interuniversitario per le Scienze del Mare [Rome, Italie] (CoNISma)
Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA)
Universitat de les Illes Balears (UIB)
Universiteit Gent = Ghent University [Belgium] (UGENT)
TAXON Estudios Ambientales S.L
Station de Recherche Océanographiques et sous-marines (STARESO )
Stareso, Pointe Revellata, BP 33, 20260 Calvi, France
Centre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CEAB)
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Madrid] (CSIC)
Evolution et Diversité Biologique (EDB)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3)
Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
The Natural History Museum [London] (NHM)
Institut méditerranéen d'océanologie (MIO)
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université de Toulon (UTLN)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
The Arctic University of Norway (UiT)
University of Bologna/Università di Bologna
Avignon Université (AU)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Institut de recherche pour le développement [IRD] : UMR237-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Universiteit Gent = Ghent University (UGENT)
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3)
Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
The Arctic University of Norway [Tromsø, Norway] (UiT)
Source :
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC, instname, Global Ecology and Conservation, Vol 32, Iss, Pp e01909-(2021), Global Ecology and Conservation, Global Ecology and Conservation, Elsevier, 2021, 32, pp.e01909. ⟨10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01909⟩, Global Ecology and Conservation, 2021, 32, pp.e01909. ⟨10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01909⟩, GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2021.

Abstract

Marine biodiversity underpins ecosystem health and societal well-being. Preservation of biodiversity hotspots is a global challenge. Molecular tools, like DNA barcoding and metabarcoding, hold great potential for biodiversity monitoring, possibly outperforming more traditional taxonomic methods. However, metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments are limited by the availability of sequences in barcoding reference databases; a lack thereof results in high percentages of unassigned sequences. In this study we (i) present the current status of known vs. barcoded marine species at a global scale based on online taxonomic and genetic databases; and (ii) compare the current status with data from ten years ago. Then we analyzed occurrence data of marine animal species from five Large Marine Ecosystems (LMEs) classified as biodiversity hotspots, to identify any consistent disparities in COI barcoding coverage between geographic regions and at phylum level. Barcoding coverage varied among LMEs (from 36.8% to 62.4% COI-barcoded species) and phyla (from 4.8% to 74.7% COI-barcoded species), with Porifera, Bryozoa and Platyhelminthes being highly underrepresented, compared to Chordata, Arthropoda and Mollusca. We demonstrate that although barcoded marine species increased from 9.5% to 14.2% since the last assessment in 2011, about 15,000 (corresponding to 7.8% increase) new species were described from 2011 to 2021. The next ten years will thus be crucial to enroll concrete collaborative measures and long term initiatives (e.g., Horizon 2030, Ocean Decade) to populate barcoding libraries for the marine realm.<br />the Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences (BiGeA) of the University of Bologna (UniBo). The CoMBoMed initiative was supported by the European Marine Research Network (EUROMARINE Network), the Inter-Departmental Research Centre for Environmental Sciences (CIRSA – UniBo), the Cultural Heritage Department (DBC - UniBo, https://beniculturali.unibo.it/it), the Fondazione Flaminia and the ERANet Mar-Tera Project SEAMoBB (Solutions for sEmi-Automated Monitoring of Benthic Biodiversity).

Details

ISSN :
23519894
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC, instname, Global Ecology and Conservation, Vol 32, Iss, Pp e01909-(2021), Global Ecology and Conservation, Global Ecology and Conservation, Elsevier, 2021, 32, pp.e01909. ⟨10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01909⟩, Global Ecology and Conservation, 2021, 32, pp.e01909. ⟨10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01909⟩, GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3d836e383d8c3b9d7d92e2fca1993414
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01909⟩