Back to Search Start Over

The prevalence, penetrance, and expressivity of etiologic IRF6 variants in orofacial clefts patients from sub‐Saharan Africa

Authors :
Jeffrey C. Murray
Lord J.J. Gowans
Tamara Busch
Peter A. Mossey
Peter Twumasi
Wasiu Lanre Adeyemo
Rahman Braimah
Pius Agbenorku
Babatunde S. Aregbesola
Gyikua Plange-Rhule
Fareed K. N. Arthur
Solomon Obiri-Yeboah
Alexander Acheampong Oti
James Olutayo
Azeez Butali
Paa Ekow Hoyte-Williams
Taye Hailu
Peter Donkor
Mekonen Eshete
Fikre Abate
Source :
Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
John Wiley and Sons Inc., 2017.

Abstract

Background Orofacial clefts are congenital malformations of the orofacial region, with a global incidence of one per 700 live births. Interferon Regulatory Factor 6 (IRF6) (OMIM:607199) gene has been associated with the etiology of both syndromic and nonsyndromic orofacial clefts. The aim of this study was to show evidence of potentially pathogenic variants in IRF6 in orofacial clefts cohorts from Africa. Methods We carried out Sanger Sequencing on DNA from 184 patients with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts and 80 individuals with multiple congenital anomalies that presented with orofacial clefts. We sequenced all the nine exons of IRF6 as well as the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions. In our analyses pipeline, we used various bioinformatics tools to detect and describe the potentially etiologic variants. Results We observed that potentially etiologic exonic and splice site variants were nonrandomly distributed among the nine exons of IRF6, with 92% of these variants occurring in exons 4 and 7. Novel variants were also observed in both nonsyndromic orofacial clefts (p.Glu69Lys, p.Asn185Thr, c.175‐2A>C and c.1060+26C>T) and multiple congenital anomalies (p.Gly65Val, p.Lys320Asn and c.379+1G>T) patients. Our data also show evidence of compound heterozygotes that may modify phenotypes that emanate from IRF6 variants. Conclusions This study demonstrates that exons 4 and 7 of IRF6 are mutational ‘hotspots’ in our cohort and that IRF6 mutants‐induced orofacial clefts may be prevalent in the Africa population, however, with variable penetrance and expressivity. These observations are relevant for detection of high‐risk families as well as genetic counseling. In conclusion, we have shown that there may be a need to combine both molecular and clinical evidence in the grouping of orofacial clefts into syndromic and nonsyndromic forms.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23249269
Volume :
5
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3cb78d1eb1955aad763df3198216b45a