Back to Search Start Over

MIcro-surgical anastomose workflow recognition challenge report

Authors :
Fabien Despinoy
Duygu Sarikaya
Wenjun Lin
Manoru Mitsuishi
Kanako Harada
Qi Dou
Wolfgang Reiter
Satoshi Kondo
Chin-Boon Chng
Laura Bravo-Sánchez
Yonghao Long
Kévin Le Mut
Pierre Jannin
Arnaud Huaulmé
Pablo Arbeláez
Laboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image (LTSI)
Université de Rennes 1 (UR1)
Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Gazi University
The Chinese University of Hong Kong [Hong Kong]
National University of Singapore (NUS)
Southern University of Science and Technology [Shenzhen] (SUSTech)
Konica Minolta Inc. [Osaka]
Universidad de los Andes [Bogota] (UNIANDES)
Wintegral GmbH
The University of Tokyo (UTokyo)
CHU Pontchaillou [Rennes]
This work was partially by ImPACT Program of Council for Science, Technology and Innovation, Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. Authors thanks the IRT b<>com for the provision of the software 'Surgery Workflow Toolbox [annotate]', used for this work.
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Rennes 1 (UR1)
Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)
Université de Rennes (UR)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech)
Source :
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Elsevier, 2021, 212, pp.106452. ⟨10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106452⟩, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2021, 212, pp.106452. ⟨10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106452⟩
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2021.

Abstract

The &quot;MIcro-Surgical Anastomose Workflow recognition on training sessions&quot; (MISAW) challenge provided a data set of 27 sequences of micro-surgical anastomosis on artificial blood vessels. This data set was composed of videos, kinematics, and workflow annotations described at three different granularity levels: phase, step, and activity. The participants were given the option to use kinematic data and videos to develop workflow recognition models. Four tasks were proposed to the participants: three of them were related to the recognition of surgical workflow at three different granularity levels, while the last one addressed the recognition of all granularity levels in the same model. One ranking was made for each task. We used the average application-dependent balanced accuracy (AD-Accuracy) as the evaluation metric. This takes unbalanced classes into account and it is more clinically relevant than a frame-by-frame score. Six teams, including a non-competing team, participated in at least one task. All models employed deep learning models, such as CNN or RNN. The best models achieved more than 95% AD-Accuracy for phase recognition, 80% for step recognition, 60% for activity recognition, and 75% for all granularity levels. For high levels of granularity (i.e., phases and steps), the best models had a recognition rate that may be sufficient for applications such as prediction of remaining surgical time or resource management. However, for activities, the recognition rate was still low for applications that can be employed clinically. The MISAW data set is publicly available to encourage further research in surgical workflow recognition. It can be found at www.synapse.org/MISAW&lt;br /&gt;Comment: MICCAI2020 challenge report, 36 pages including 15 for supplementary material (complet results for each participating teams), 17 figures

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01692607
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Elsevier, 2021, 212, pp.106452. ⟨10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106452⟩, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2021, 212, pp.106452. ⟨10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106452⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3cb71ddab503510bccd6e287dbd4a263
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106452⟩