Back to Search
Start Over
Soil health through soil disease suppression: Which strategy from descriptors to indicators?
- Source :
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Elsevier, 2007, 39 (1), pp.1-23. ⟨10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.07.001⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2007
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2007.
-
Abstract
- International audience; Soil is a component of primary importance in crop production, even if it is often neglected, or only regarded as a physical support for the growth of plants. However, with the increasing societal concerns for the sustainability of agriculture, soil must be considered as a living system. Its quality results from the multiple interactions among physicochemical and biological components, notably the microbial communities, primordial for soil function. Crops are threatened by soil-borne diseases. These are often difficult to control, because of the “hidden” status of the pathogens and also because of the absence, noxiousness or lack of efficacy of chemical treatments. In this context, there is a renewed interest for cultural practices such as the use of organic amendments. These practices have a strong influence on soil health, which takes into account plant health, through both changes of physicochemical characteristics and influence on soil microbial communities. Cultural practices are used to improve soil health, and can, in some cases, increase soil disease suppression. The effects of these practices on soil properties have been studied, but the relationship between these properties and soil suppressiveness has not been always very clear. Many different soil descriptors, either abiotic or biotic, have been used to describe the soil health and suppressiveness, but there is a lack of identified, reliable and consistent indicators. One aim of this review is to show that, despite the age of the soil health concept and all the studies that have been conducted, there are still no guidelines for assessment of soil quality from the plant health point of view. Obviously, the extreme diversity of situations makes any generalisation from a given case-study difficult. However, based on what has already been done in related fields, a methodology to search for indicators of soil health can be proposed. In this review we will present (i) how a healthy soil can be defined and what are the concepts hidden behind the words “soil health,” (ii) which cultural practices have been used to control soil-borne diseases and their limitations, (iii) which soil parameters have been measured when studying soil suppressiveness, and which relationships have been found between these parameters, and finally (iv) how these descriptors could become indicators of soil health, using appropriate analytical and statistical methods.
- Subjects :
- 0106 biological sciences
SOIL QUALITY
media_common.quotation_subject
data analysis
SOIL HEALTH
microbial communities
Soil Science
Context (language use)
BIOTIC AND ABIOTIC FACTORS
[SDV.SA.SDS]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Soil study
complex mixtures
01 natural sciences
Microbiology
DATA ANALYSIS
disease suppression
CULTURAL PRACTICES
Cultural practice
Quality (business)
soil quality
MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES
INDICATOR
media_common
cultural practices
biotic and abiotic factors
2. Zero hunger
Soil health
soil health
business.industry
Ecology
indicator
Environmental resource management
DISEASE SUPPRESSION
SANTE DU SOL
04 agricultural and veterinary sciences
15. Life on land
Soil quality
Agriculture
Sustainability
040103 agronomy & agriculture
0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries
Environmental science
business
010606 plant biology & botany
Diversity (politics)
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 00380717
- Volume :
- 39
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....3c69f1dd5313a3b9b5d956ab63d0fd72
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.07.001