Back to Search
Start Over
Effects of tDCS on the attentional blink revisited
- Source :
- PLoS ONE, 17(1):e0262718. Public Library of Science, PLoS ONE, 17(1):e0262718, 1-23. Public Library of Science, PLoS ONE, Vol 17, Iss 1, p e0262718 (2022), PLoS ONE, PLoS ONE, 17(1):e0262718. PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, Reteig, L C, Newman, L A, Ridderinkhof, K R & Slagter, H A 2022, ' Effects of tDCS on the attentional blink revisited: A statistical evaluation of a replication attempt ', PLoS ONE, vol. 17, no. 1, e0262718, pp. 1-23 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262718
- Publication Year :
- 2022
- Publisher :
- PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 2022.
-
Abstract
- The attentional blink (AB) phenomenon reveals a bottleneck of human information processing: the second of two targets is often missed when they are presented in rapid succession among distractors. In our previous work, we showed that the size of the AB can be changed by applying transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) (London & Slagter, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33, 756–68, 2021). Although AB size at the group level remained unchanged, the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS were negatively correlated: if a given individual’s AB size decreased from baseline during anodal tDCS, their AB size would increase during cathodal tDCS, and vice versa. Here, we attempted to replicate this finding. We found no group effects of tDCS, as in the original study, but we no longer found a significant negative correlation. We present a series of statistical measures of replication success, all of which confirm that both studies are not in agreement. First, the correlation here is significantly smaller than a conservative estimate of the original correlation. Second, the difference between the correlations is greater than expected due to sampling error, and our data are more consistent with a zero-effect than with the original estimate. Finally, the overall effect when combining both studies is small and not significant. Our findings thus indicate that the effects of lDPLFC-tDCS on the AB are less substantial than observed in our initial study. Although this should be quite a common scenario, null findings can be difficult to interpret and are still under-represented in the brain stimulation and cognitive neuroscience literatures. An important auxiliary goal of this paper is therefore to provide a tutorial for other researchers, to maximize the evidential value from null findings.
- Subjects :
- Male
Physiology
Astronomy
Social Sciences
Astronomical Sciences
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Mathematical and Statistical Techniques
Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation
London
Medicine and Health Sciences
Psychology
Attention
Clinical Neurophysiology
Brain Mapping
Multidisciplinary
Statistics
Electroencephalography
Metaanalysis
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Electrophysiology
Bioassays and Physiological Analysis
Brain Electrophysiology
Optical Equipment
Research Design
Physical Sciences
Engineering and Technology
Medicine
Female
Astronomical Instruments
Research Article
Adult
Adolescent
Imaging Techniques
Science
Replication Studies
Prefrontal Cortex
Neurophysiology
Equipment
Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures
Neuroimaging
Research and Analysis Methods
Attentional Blink
Young Adult
Humans
Statistical Methods
Transcranial Stimulation
Functional Electrical Stimulation
Electrophysiological Techniques
Cognitive Psychology
Biology and Life Sciences
Cognitive Science
Clinical Medicine
Mathematics
Neuroscience
Telescopes
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 19326203
- Volume :
- 17
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- PLOS-One
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....3b1d5a2bc83e053dc9e46817fc62d768