Back to Search Start Over

Clinical Evaluation of Cefuzonam (CZON) for Bacterial Pneumonia and Lung Abscess Comparative Study with Cefotiam (CTM)

Authors :
Hiroyuki KOBAYASHI
Hiroshi OSHITANI
Masahiko YOSHIDA
Akira SAITO
Ichiro NAKAYAMA
Kazuo TAKEBE
Mitsuo MASUDA
Seiichi MURAKAMI
Hiroaki TANAKA
Tsukiko TOMIYAMA
Kenichi KIMURA
Kazuya KANNARI
Shiro KOSAKA
Kiyoshi KONNO
Kotaro OIZUMI
Akira WATANABE
Yutaka TOKUE
Reiko ONO
Yoshihiro HONDA
Satoshi SHOJI
Naoto KITAMURA
Izumi HAYASHI
Masaaki ARAKAWA
Masanaga TAKATO
Koichi WADA
Norio SUZUKI
Kaoru SHIMADA
Yasuyuki SANO
Yasuo ARAI
Hiroichi TANIMOTO
Koichiro NAKATA
Yoshitaka NAKAMORI
Tatsuo NAKATANI
Hiroshi NARUI
Shigeki ODAGIRI
Kaneo SUZUKI
Kou MUROHASHI
Hiroyuki NUMATA
Kenichi TAKAHASHI
Izumi KOYAMA
Shunichi ISHII
Fumio MIKI
Rinzo SOEJIMA
Jiro HINO
Toshiharu MATSUSHIMA
Jun TANABE
Osamu KURIMURA
Hideo SASAKI
Hirofumi FUKUHARA
Tadao MORIMOTO
Kohei HARA
Shigeru KOHNO
Hironobu KOGA
Yasumasa DOUTSU
Toshiaki HAYASHI
Mitsuo KAKU
Shinichiro KANZAKI
Masao NAKATOMI
Kohta KOHNO
Takakazu KITANI
Hiroshi TOMITA
Osamu SAKITO
Keizo MATSUMOTO
Tsuyoshi NAGATAKE
Naoto RIKITOMI
Atsushi TAKAHASHI
Masakazu TAKASUGI
Hironori MASAKI
Masaru NASU
Yoichiro GOTO
Hideaki SHIGENO
Jun GOTO
Takayoshi TASHIRO
Atsushi SAITO
Yoshiteru SHIGENO
Yuei IRABU
Keizo YAMAGUCHI
Kazuyuki SUGAHARA
Chikako MOCHIDA
Mitsuyoshi NAKASHIMA
Source :
Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. 65:381-399
Publication Year :
1991
Publisher :
The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, 1991.

Abstract

A double blind study was conducted to objectively evaluate the usefulness of Cefuzonam (CZON) in the treatment of bacterial pneumonia and lung abscess. Cefotiam (CTM) was used as a control drug. Each drug was administered by intravenous drip infusion at 1 g at a time, twice daily, for 14 days as a rule. The results are as follows: 1. Enrolled in this study were 145 cases in total, comprising 72 of CZON group and 73 of CTM group. Of the total cases, 109 (53 of CZON group and 56 CTM group) were evaluated for clinical efficacy by the evaluation committee. Exclusion rate and background of patients were not significantly different between the two groups. 2. Clinical effectiveness assessed by the committee showed the efficacy rates of 84.9% (45 cases out of 53) for the CZON group and 83.3% (47 cases out of 56) for the CTM group, with no significant difference between the two groups. 3. The bacteriological eradication rates were 89.5% (17 strains out of 19) for the CZON group and 78.3% (18 strains out of 23) for the CTM group, with no significant difference between the two groups. 4. The incidence of side effects was 5 cases (7.5%) for the CZON group and 3 cases (4.2%) for the CTM group. The incidence rate of laboratory test abnormality was 28.4% (19 cases out of 67) for the CZON group and 31.3% (12 cases out of 67) for the CTM group. There was no significant difference between the two groups. 5. Usefulness rates calculated by the committee were 79.2% (42 cases out of 53) for the CZON group and 76.8% (43 cases out of 56) for the CTM group. There was no significant difference between the two groups. These results show that CZON is a useful drug in the treatment of bacterial pneumonia and lung abscess.

Details

ISSN :
1884569X and 03875911
Volume :
65
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3a9d86b92eb92b643ff13dc0c3af229f