Back to Search Start Over

Catheter-based ultrasound renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension: the randomized, controlled REQUIRE trial

Authors :
Tomoaki Matsumoto
Keisuke Okamura
Hidenori Urata
Chong Jin Kim
Kouichi Tamura
Satoko Nakamura
Keisuke Shinohara
Shuichi Seki
Woong Chol Kang
Naoto Inoue
Kazuhiko Yumoto
Keigo Dote
Satoaki Matoba
Ken-ichiro Sasaki
Hyun Jae Kang
Kazunori Horie
Takafumi Ueno
Akiko Matsuo
Taro Shibasaki
Yoshihiro Morino
Hisashi Kai
Tomokazu Ikemoto
Fumiki Yoshihara
Masato Nakamura
Seung-Hyuk Choi
Shigeo Sugawara
Kazuomi Kario
Yoshiaki Yokoi
Toshiyuki Takahashi
Hiroyoshi Yokoi
Eiichiro Yamamoto
Yukako Ogoyama
Yasushi Sakata
Yasushi Mukai
Chan Joon Kim
Yuhei Nojima
Shinsuke Nanto
Masahiko Fujihara
Yoshisato Shibata
Hiroshi Fujita
Hirofumi Tomita
Jin Man Cho
Source :
Hypertension Research
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021.

Abstract

Abstract Renal denervation is a promising new non-pharmacological treatment for resistant hypertension. However, there is a lack of data from Asian patients. The REQUIRE trial investigated the blood pressure-lowering efficacy of renal denervation in treated patients with resistant hypertension from Japan and South Korea. Adults with resistant hypertension (seated office blood pressure ≥150/90 mmHg and 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg) with suitable renal artery anatomy were randomized to ultrasound renal denervation or a sham procedure. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 3 months. A total of 143 patients were included (72 renal denervation, 71 sham control). Reduction from baseline in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 3 months was not significantly different between the renal denervation (−6.6 mmHg) and sham control (−6.5 mmHg) groups (difference: −0.1, 95% confidence interval −5.5, 5.3; p = 0.971). Reductions from baseline in home and office systolic blood pressure (differences: –1.8 mmHg [p = 0.488] and −2.0 mmHg [p = 0.511], respectively), and medication load, did not differ significantly between the two groups. The procedure-/device-related major adverse events was not seen. This study did not show a significant difference in ambulatory blood pressure reductions between renal denervation and a sham procedure in treated patients with resistant hypertension. Although blood pressure reduction after renal denervation was similar to other sham-controlled studies, the sham group in this study showed much greater reduction. This unexpected blood pressure reduction in the sham control group highlights study design issues that will be addressed in a new trial. Clinical trial registration NCT02918305 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Details

ISSN :
13484214 and 09169636
Volume :
45
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Hypertension Research
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....39715166edb084b39804a79b2bb8afbf