Back to Search Start Over

Randomized trial of intravenous immunoglobulin maintenance treatment regimens in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Authors :
Daan Nieboer
Ingemar S. J. Merkies
Hester F. Lingsma
Filip Eftimov
P.A. van Doorn
Bart C. Jacobs
Krista Kuitwaard
Esther Brusse
Nicolette C. Notermans
A. F. J. E. Vrancken
A. J. van der Kooi
Willem-Jan R. Fokkink
Neurology
Immunology
Public Health
AII - Inflammatory diseases
ANS - Neuroinfection & -inflammation
EURO-NMD
RS: MHeNs - R1 - Cognitive Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
Klinische Neurowetenschappen
Source :
European Journal of Neurology, 28(1), 286-296. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd, European journal of neurology, 28(1), 286-296. Wiley-Blackwell, European Journal of Neurology, European Journal of Neurology, 28(1), 286-296. Wiley
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

More frequent lower dosing does not further improve the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in stable IVIg‐dependent chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. More frequent lower dosing does lead to more stable serum immunoglobulin G levels but not to higher trough levels (Fig. 3).<br />Background and purpose High peak serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels may not be needed for maintenance intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and such high levels may cause side effects. More frequent lower dosing may lead to more stable IgG levels and higher trough levels, which might improve efficacy. The aim of this trial is to investigate whether high frequent low dosage IVIg treatment is more effective than low frequent high dosage IVIg treatment. Methods In this randomized placebo‐controlled crossover trial, we included patients with CIDP proven to be IVIg‐dependent and receiving an individually established stable dose and interval of IVIg maintenance treatment. In the control arm, patients received their individual IVIg dose and interval followed by a placebo infusion at half the interval. In the intervention arm, patients received half their individual dose at half the interval. After a wash‐out phase patients crossed over. The primary outcome measure was handgrip strength (assessed using a Martin Vigorimeter). Secondary outcome indicators were health‐related quality of life (36‐item Short‐Form Health Survey), disability (Inflammatory Rasch‐built Overall Disability Scale), fatigue (Rasch‐built Fatigue Severity Scale) and side effects. Results Twenty‐five patients were included and were treated at baseline with individually adjusted dosages of IVIg ranging from 20 to 80 g and intervals ranging from 14 to 35 days. Three participants did not complete the trial; the main analysis was therefore based on the 22 patients completing both treatment periods. There was no significant difference in handgrip strength change from baseline between the two treatment regimens (coefficient −2.71, 95% CI −5.4, 0.01). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes or side effects. Conclusions More frequent lower dosing does not further improve the efficacy of IVIg in stable IVIg‐dependent CIDP and does not result in fewer side effects.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13515101
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Journal of Neurology, 28(1), 286-296. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd, European journal of neurology, 28(1), 286-296. Wiley-Blackwell, European Journal of Neurology, European Journal of Neurology, 28(1), 286-296. Wiley
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....392529bd96d4ec5c60048d3550a88e8e