Back to Search
Start Over
Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects-2010
- Source :
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Archives of Toxicology, 85(5), 367-485. Springer, Archives of toxicology, Adler, S, Basketter, D, Creton, S, Pelkonen, O, van Benthem, J, Zuang, V, Andersen, K E, Angers-Loustau, A, Aptula, A, Bal-Price, A, Benfenati, E, Bernauer, U, Bessems, J, Bois, F Y, Boobis, A, Brandon, E, Bremer, S, Broschard, T, Casati, S, Coecke, S, Corvi, R, Cronin, M, Daston, G, Dekant, W, Felter, S, Grignard, E, Gundert-Remy, U, Heinonen, T, Kimber, I, Kleinjans, J, Komulainen, H, Kreiling, R, Kreysa, J, Leite, S B, Loizou, G, Maxwell, G, Mazzatorta, P, Munn, S, Pfuhler, S, Phrakonkham, P, Piersma, A, Poth, A, Prieto, P, Repetto, G, Rogiers, V, Schoeters, G, Schwarz, M, Serafimova, R, Tähti, H, Testai, E, van Delft, J, van Loveren, H, Vinken, M, Worth, A & Zaldivar, J-M 2011, ' Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects-2010 ', Archives of Toxicology, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 367-485 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-011-0693-2
- Publication Year :
- 2011
-
Abstract
- The 7th amendment to the EU Cosmetics Directive prohibits to put animal-tested cosmetics on the market in Europe after 2013. In that context, the European Commission invited stakeholder bodies (industry, non-governmental organisations, EU Member States, and the Commissions Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety) to identify scientific experts in five toxicological areas, i.e. toxicokinetics, repeated dose toxicity, carcinogenicity, skin sensitisation, and reproductive toxicity for which the Directive foresees that the 2013 deadline could be further extended in case alternative and validated methods would not be available in time. The selected experts were asked to analyse the status and prospects of alternative methods and to provide a scientifically sound estimate of the time necessary to achieve full replacement of animal testing. In summary, the experts confirmed that it will take at least another 79 years for the replacement of the current in vivo animal tests used for the safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients for skin sensitisation. However, the experts were also of the opinion that alternative methods may be able to give hazard information, i.e. to differentiate between sensitisers and non-sensitisers, ahead of 2017. This would, however, not provide the complete picture of what is a safe exposure because the relative potency of a sensitiser would not be known. For toxicokinetics, the timeframe was 57 years to develop the models still lacking to predict lung absorption and renal/biliary excretion, and even longer to integrate the methods to fully replace the animal toxicokinetic models. For the systemic toxicological endpoints of repeated dose toxicity, carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity, the time horizon for full replacement could not be estimated.
- Subjects :
- Reproductive toxicity
Carcinogenicity Tests
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
media_common.quotation_subject
Pharmacology toxicology
Art history
Biological Availability
Guidelines as Topic
Cosmetics
Multiple dose
Toxicology
Animal Testing Alternatives
Risk Assessment
Toxicity Tests
Animals
Humans
European Union
Biology
media_common
Skin
Alternative methods
Carcinogenicity
Medical screening
Reproducibility of Results
General Medicine
Art
Repeated dose toxicity
Skin sensitisation
Toxicokinetics
Consumer Product Safety
Human medicine
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 03405761
- Volume :
- 85
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Archives of Toxicology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....38e974111045922b66d7c9117f0f0d7f