Back to Search
Start Over
Use of 18F-NaF PET in the staging of skeletal metastases of newly diagnosed, high-risk prostate cancer patients:a nationwide cohort study
- Source :
- Mogensen, A W, Petersen, L J, Torp-Pedersen, C, Nørgaard, M, Pank, M T & Zacho, H D 2022, ' Use of 18F-NaF PET in the staging of skeletal metastases of newly diagnosed, high-risk prostate cancer patients : a nationwide cohort study ', BMJ Open, vol. 12, no. 6, e058898 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058898, Mogensen, A W, Petersen, L J, Torp-Pedersen, C, Nørgaard, M, Pank, M T & Zacho, H D 2022, ' Use of 18 F-NaF PET in the staging of skeletal metastases of newly diagnosed, high-risk prostate cancer patients : A nationwide cohort study ', BMJ Open, vol. 12, no. 6, e058898 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058898
- Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- ObjectiveTo determine whether preoperative staging of high-risk prostate cancer with 18F-sodium-fluoride (18F-NaF) positron emission tomography (PET) reduces the risk of skeletal metastases.DesignNationwide, population-based cohort study using real-world data.SettingThe study used national health registries, including all sites in Denmark from 2011 to 2018.ParticipantsNewly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy from 2011 to 2018. Patients were stratified into two groups according to the preoperative imaging modality of either 18F-NaF PET or bone scintigraphy.Main outcome measuresThe risk of skeletal-related events (SREs) as a proxy for skeletal metastases following radical prostatectomy. The secondary endpoint was overall survival.ResultsBetween 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2018, 4183 high-risk patients underwent radical prostatectomy. Of these patients, 807 (19.3%) underwent 18F-NaF PET and 2161 (51.7%) underwent bone scintigraphy. The remaining 30% were examined by a different imaging method or did not undergo imaging. Using the inverse probability of treatment weighting to control potential confounding, the HR of experiencing an SRE for patients in the 18F-NaF PET group versus the bone scintigraphy group was 1.15 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.54). The 3-year survival rates were 97.4% (95% CI 96.1 to 98.7) and 97.1% (95% CI 96.4 to 97.9) for patients receiving 18F-NaF PET and bone scintigraphy, respectively.ConclusionPatients with high-risk prostate cancer undergoing preoperative staging with 18F-NaF PET did not display a lower risk of developing SREs after prostatectomy compared with patients undergoing bone scintigraphy. The survival rates were similar between the two groups.
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Mogensen, A W, Petersen, L J, Torp-Pedersen, C, Nørgaard, M, Pank, M T & Zacho, H D 2022, ' Use of 18F-NaF PET in the staging of skeletal metastases of newly diagnosed, high-risk prostate cancer patients : a nationwide cohort study ', BMJ Open, vol. 12, no. 6, e058898 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058898, Mogensen, A W, Petersen, L J, Torp-Pedersen, C, Nørgaard, M, Pank, M T & Zacho, H D 2022, ' Use of 18 F-NaF PET in the staging of skeletal metastases of newly diagnosed, high-risk prostate cancer patients : A nationwide cohort study ', BMJ Open, vol. 12, no. 6, e058898 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058898
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....38e4dbbc665ad866a0c85d84c5507122
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058898