Back to Search Start Over

Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews

Authors :
Danielle, Pollock
Micah D J, Peters
Hanan, Khalil
Patricia, McInerney
Lyndsay, Alexander
Andrea C, Tricco
Catrin, Evans
Érica Brandão, de Moraes
Christina M, Godfrey
Dawid, Pieper
Ashrita, Saran
Cindy, Stern
Zachary, Munn
Pollock, Danielle
Peters, Micah DJ
Khalil, Hanan
McInerney, Patricia
Alexander, Lyndsay
Tricco, Andrea
Evans, Catrin
de Moraes, Erica Brandao
Godfrey, Christina
Pieper, Dawid
Saran, Ashrita
Stern, Cindy
Munn, Zachary
Source :
JBI Evidence Synthesis. 21:520-532
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2022.

Abstract

Scoping reviewers often face challenges in the extraction, analysis, and presentation of scoping review results. Using best-practice examples and drawing on the expertise of the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group and an editor of a journal that publishes scoping reviews, this paper expands on existing JBI scoping review guidance. The aim of this article is to clarify the process of extracting data from different sources of evidence; discuss what data should be extracted (and what should not); outline how to analyze extracted data, including an explanation of basic qualitative content analysis; and offer suggestions for the presentation of results in scoping reviews. Refereed/Peer-reviewed

Details

ISSN :
26898381
Volume :
21
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JBI Evidence Synthesis
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....38914a98aa28d0c720292b30187fe2f2