Back to Search Start Over

2015 Revised Utstein-Style Recommended Guidelines for Uniform Reporting of Data From Drowning-Related Resuscitation: An ILCOR Advisory Statement

Authors :
Bo Løfgren
Stephen Beerman
Allart M. Venema
Joost J.L.M. Bierens
Masahiko Nitta
Ahamed H. Idris
David S. Warner
Ulrich Jost
Luiz Morizot-Leite
Volker Wenzel
Chun Song Youn
Peter T. Morley
Mary Fran Hazinski
Jan Thorsten Gräsner
Alexis A. Topjian
Jonathon Webber
Christine M. Branche
David Szpilman
Linda Quan
Gavin D. Perkins
Cameron Dezfulian
Vinay M. Nadkarni
Anthony J. Handley
Emergency Medicine
Source :
Resuscitation, 118, 147-158. ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2017.

Abstract

Background— Utstein-style guidelines use an established consensus process, endorsed by the international resuscitation community, to facilitate and structure resuscitation research and publication. The first “Guidelines for Uniform Reporting of Data From Drowning” were published over a decade ago. During the intervening years, resuscitation science has advanced considerably, thus making revision of the guidelines timely. In particular, measurement of cardiopulmonary resuscitation elements and neurological outcomes reporting have advanced substantially. The purpose of this report is to provide updated guidelines for reporting data from studies of resuscitation from drowning. Methods— An international group with scientific expertise in the fields of drowning research, resuscitation research, emergency medical services, public health, and development of guidelines met in Potsdam, Germany, to determine the data that should be reported in scientific articles on the subject of resuscitation from drowning. At the Utstein-style meeting, participants discussed data elements in detail, defined the data, determined data priority, and decided how data should be reported, including scoring methods and category details. Results— The template for reporting data from drowning research was revised extensively, with new emphasis on measurement of quality of resuscitation, neurological outcomes, and deletion of data that have proved to be less relevant or difficult to capture. Conclusions— The report describes the consensus process, rationale for selecting data elements to be reported, definitions and priority of data, and scoring methods. These guidelines are intended to improve the clarity of scientific communication and the comparability of scientific investigations.

Details

ISSN :
19417705, 19417713, and 03009572
Volume :
10
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....37fde7b8813c5128aa4209bad32e4cc1