Prognostic Factors in Extraovarian Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma

To determine the pathological, clinical, and therapeutic factors which had prognostic significance in women with extraovarian primary peritoneal carcinoma (EOPPC).A retrospective, clinicopathologic study was conducted of 75 women diagnosed with EOPPC. Diagnosis and assessment of prognostic pathological factors were based on the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) criteria. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the following factors for their effect on overall survival: age, parity, presenting symptoms and signs, ascites, CA 125 level, history of oophorectomy, maximum ovarian dimension, histologic type, architectural and nuclear grades, number of mitosis and psammoma bodies, depth of ovarian invasion, estrogen and progesterone receptors (positive, negative), p53 overexpression (present, absent), performance status (GOG criteria), stage (FIGO criteria for ovarian cancer), debulking surgery (optimal versus suboptimal), first-line chemotherapy (platin-based without paclitaxel versus platin/paclitaxel), secondary cytoreduction, and second-line chemotherapy (paclitaxel-based versus no paclitaxel).The median overall survival of all patients was 23.5 months (95% CI 18.6, 39.8 months). The 5-year survival was 26.5% (SE 6.7%). p53 overexpression and estrogen and progesterone receptor positivity were demonstrated in 42.4, 50.0, and 6.3%, respectively. In univariate analysis, performance status, primary debulking surgery, stage, and age were significant on overall survival (P0.001,0. 001, 0.004, and 0.012, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only performance status (P0.001) and primary debulking surgery (P = 0. 03) were independent prognostic factors. Conclusions. Overall survival in women with EOPPC is affected significantly by performance status and primary debulking surgery as independent variables. To improve survival, efforts should be made to achieve optimal tumor cytoreduction at primary surgery.