Back to Search Start Over

Oskar Lange and the Walrasian interpretation of IS-LM

Authors :
Goulven Rubin
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 (LEM)
Université d'Artois (UA)-Université catholique de Lille (UCL)-Université de Lille-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Source :
Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Informa UK (Taylor & Francis), 2016, 38 (03), pp.285--309. ⟨10.1017/s1053837216000341⟩, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2016, 38 (03), pp.285--309. ⟨10.1017/s1053837216000341⟩
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2016.

Abstract

International audience; A few years after the publication of The General Theory, a number of economists began to present John Maynard Keynes’s model, identified with IS‐LM, as a particular case of the Walrasian model. This view of IS‐LM has often been rationalized by a basic syllogism: IS‐LM was invented by John Hicks, Hicks was a Walrasian, hence IS‐LM was Walrasian. But as some historians of macroeconomics have shown, this syllogism is false. Considering this confusion as an established fact, this article studies how and why IS‐LM came to be considered as Walrasian. It shows that the standard view took its roots in “The Rate of Interest and the Optimum Propensity to Consume,” a paper published by Oskar Lange in 1938, and resulted from a need to clarify the foundations of Keynes’s theory. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10427716 and 14699656
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Informa UK (Taylor & Francis), 2016, 38 (03), pp.285--309. ⟨10.1017/s1053837216000341⟩, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2016, 38 (03), pp.285--309. ⟨10.1017/s1053837216000341⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....37b9b1420b940145fad7320f5e8614c2