Back to Search Start Over

Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition and Renal Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Authors :
Martina M. McGrath
Brian Claggett
Dirk J. van Veldhuisen
Marc A. Pfeffer
Finnian R. Mc Causland
Josep Comín-Colet
Milton Packer
Martin Lefkowitz
John J.V. McMurray
Faiez Zannad
Pardeep S. Jhund
Scott D. Solomon
Victor Shi
Nagesh S. Anavekar
Mauro Gori
Michele Senni
Cardiovascular Centre (CVC)
Mc Causland, F
Lefkowitz, M
Claggett, B
Anavekar, N
Senni, M
Gori, M
Jhund, P
Mcgrath, M
Packer, M
Shi, V
Van Veldhuisen, D
Zannad, F
Comin-Colet, J
Pfeffer, M
Mcmurray, J
Solomon, S
Source :
Circulation, 142(13), 1236-1245. LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2020.

Abstract

Background: In patients with heart failure, chronic kidney disease is common and associated with a higher risk of renal events than in patients without chronic kidney disease. We assessed the renal effects of angiotensin/neprilysin inhibition in patients who have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction enrolled in the PARAGON-HF trial (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB Global Outcomes in HF With Preserved Ejection Fraction). Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, event-driven trial, we assigned 4822 patients who had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction to receive sacubitril/valsartan (n=2419) or valsartan (n=2403). Herein, we present the results of the prespecified renal composite outcome (time to first occurrence of either: ≥50% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), end-stage renal disease, or death from renal causes), the individual components of this composite, and the influence of therapy on eGFR slope. Results: At randomization, eGFR was 63±19 mL·min –1 ·1.73 m – 2. At study closure, the composite renal outcome occurred in 33 patients (1.4%) assigned to sacubitril/valsartan and 64 patients (2.7%) assigned to valsartan (hazard ratio, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.33–0.77]; P =0.001). The treatment effect on the composite renal end point did not differ according to the baseline eGFR (–1 ·1.73 m –2 ( P -interaction=0.92). The decline in eGFR was less for sacubitril/valsartan than for valsartan (–2.0 [95% CI, –2.2 to –1.9] versus –2.7 [95% CI, –2.8 to –2.5] mL·min –1 ·1.73 m –2 per year). Conclusions: In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, sacubitril/valsartan reduced the risk of renal events, and slowed decline in eGFR, in comparison with valsartan. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01920711.

Details

ISSN :
15244539 and 00097322
Volume :
142
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Circulation
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....375de5862b1476746a17a7b31d35c79f