Back to Search Start Over

Effects of salinity on fish assemblage structure : an evaluation based on taxonomic and functional approaches in the Casamance estuary (Senegal, West Africa)

Authors :
Justin Kantoussan
Jean Marc Ecoutin
Raymond Laë
Monique Simier
Luis Tito de Morais
Université Gaston Berger de Saint-Louis Sénégal (UGB)
Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Environnement Marin (LEMAR) (LEMAR)
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Université de Brest (UBO)-Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer (IUEM)
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université de Brest (UBO)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université de Brest (UBO)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)
UMR 212 EME 'écosystèmes marins exploités' (EME)
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Université de Montpellier (UM)
Source :
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, Elsevier, 2012, 113, pp.152-162. ⟨10.1016/j.ecss.2012.07.018⟩
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

International audience; The utility of taxonomic and functional approaches in assessing the structure of fish communities is tested in the hypersaline estuary of the Casamance river using data from surveys of commercial fisheries conducted between April and July of 2005. Both taxonomic and functional diversity decrease from downstream to upstream regions of the estuary. In terms of species composition, marine-estuarine species (33.3-46.3%, depending on the site) and estuarine species of marine origin (29.3-41.7%) dominate the exploited population in the Casamance estuary. In contrast, the proportion of strictly estuarine species observed upstream is twice that observed downstream. Quantitative analysis based on biomass landed distinguishes two groups in the population: (1) a group of species that is dominant downstream, containing primarily terminal predators and secondary consumers categorised as marine species that are occasional or accessory in estuaries, estuarine marine species, and estuarine species of marine origin; and (2) a group of species characteristic of the upstream region, dominated by a few species (Sarotherodon melanotheron, Tilapia guineensis, and Mugil cephalus) mainly of strictly estuarine and/or herbivorous categories and Elops lacerta, a carnivore fish. The outcomes of the two approaches are similar, and both indicate that the fish community in this estuary is under the influence of strong environmental disturbance. However, the scales at which the specific and functional approaches most reliably reflect environmental conditions are different. The taxonomic approach, i.e., the use of specific biomass is more appropriate at the ecosystem scale and therefore more accessible to local human communities, whereas the functional approach is better suited to regional and sub-regional studies because of the change in species composition from one environment to another.

Details

ISSN :
02727714 and 10960015
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, Elsevier, 2012, 113, pp.152-162. ⟨10.1016/j.ecss.2012.07.018⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3737fa1b41d9f468bdafa4ea0f8dd986
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2012.07.018⟩