Back to Search Start Over

High-dose-rate brachytherapy and hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy combined with long-term hormonal therapy for high-risk and very high-risk prostate cancer: outcomes after 5-year follow-up

Authors :
Kazushige Hayakawa
Shouko Komori
Hiromichi Ishiyama
Masaomi Ikeda
Ken-ichi Tabata
Masashi Kitano
Akane Sekiguchi
Takefumi Satoh
Masatsugu Iwamura
Itaru Soda
Shogo Kawakami
Shinji Kurosaka
Masaki Kimura
Source :
Journal of Radiation Research
Publication Year :
2013
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2013.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) combined with long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria-defined high-risk (HR) and very high-risk (VHR) prostate cancer. Data from 178 HR (n = 96, 54%) and VHR (n = 82, 46%) prostate cancer patients who underwent (192)Ir-HDR brachytherapy and hypofractionated EBRT with long-term ADT between 2003 and 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean dose to 90% of the planning target volume was 6.3 Gy/fraction of HDR brachytherapy. After five fractions of HDR treatment, EBRT with 10 fractions of 3 Gy was administered. All patients initially underwent ≥ 6 months of neoadjuvant ADT, and adjuvant ADT was continued for 36 months after EBRT. The median follow-up was 61 months (range, 25-94 months) from the start of radiotherapy. The 5-year biochemical non-evidence of disease, freedom from clinical failure and overall survival rates were 90.6% (HR, 97.8%; VHR, 81.9%), 95.2% (HR, 97.7%; VHR, 92.1%), and 96.9% (HR, 100%; VHR, 93.3%), respectively. The highest Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-defined late genitourinary toxicities were Grade 2 in 7.3% of patients and Grade 3 in 9.6%. The highest late gastrointestinal toxicities were Grade 2 in 2.8% of patients and Grade 3 in 0%. Although the 5-year outcome of this tri-modality approach seems favorable, further follow-up is necessary to validate clinical and survival advantages of this intensive approach compared with the standard EBRT approach.

Details

ISSN :
13499157 and 04493060
Volume :
55
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Radiation Research
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....36a34d5ae678edfef4ce3502aae6e56f
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrt128