Back to Search
Start Over
International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium summit on the management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer
- Source :
- Gut, 62(3), 339-347, Gut, 62(3), 339-347. BMJ Publishing Group, Gut, 62(3), 339. BMJ Publishing Group
- Publication Year :
- 2013
-
Abstract
- Background Screening individuals at increased risk for pancreatic cancer (PC) detects early, potentially curable, pancreatic neoplasia. Objective To develop consortium statements on screening, surveillance and management of high-risk individuals with an inherited predisposition to PC. Methods A 49-expert multidisciplinary international consortium met to discuss pancreatic screening and vote on statements. Consensus was considered reached if ≥75% agreed or disagreed. Results There was excellent agreement that, to be successful, a screening programme should detect and treat T1N0M0 margin-negative PC and high-grade dysplastic precursor lesions (pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm). It was agreed that the following were candidates for screening: first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with PC from a familial PC kindred with at least two affected FDRs; patients with Peutz–Jeghers syndrome; and p16, BRCA2 and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) mutation carriers with ≥1 affected FDR. Consensus was not reached for the age to initiate screening or stop surveillance. It was agreed that initial screening should include endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and/or MRI/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography not CT or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. There was no consensus on the need for EUS fine-needle aspiration to evaluate cysts. There was disagreement on optimal screening modalities and intervals for follow-up imaging. When surgery is recommended it should be performed at a high-volume centre. There was great disagreement as to which screening abnormalities were of sufficient concern to for surgery to be recommended. Conclusions Screening is recommended for high-risk individuals, but more evidence is needed, particularly for how to manage patients with detected lesions. Screening and subsequent management should take place at high-volume centres with multidisciplinary teams, preferably within research protocols.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance
Colorectal cancer
Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Endosonography
Pancreatectomy
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Risk Factors
Pancreatic cancer
Internal medicine
medicine
Humans
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Magnetic Resonance
Early Detection of Cancer
Intraepithelial neoplasia
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
medicine.diagnostic_test
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm
business.industry
General surgery
Carcinoma
Gastroenterology
Age Factors
Cancer
medicine.disease
Cholangiopancreatography
Pedigree
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Treatment Outcome
Follow-Up Studies
Mutation
Neoplasm Grading
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 00175749
- Volume :
- 62
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Gut
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....36785dd73e00061e39e3405b4d35b313