Back to Search Start Over

International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium summit on the management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer

Authors :
Canto MI
Harinck F
Hruban RH
Offerhaus GJ
Poley JW
Kamel I
Nio Y
Schulick RS
Bassi C
Kluijt I
Levy MJ
Chak A
Fockens P
Goggins M
Bruno M
International Cancer of Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium
Arcidiacono P.G.
(Milan
Italy)
Detlef Bartsch (Marburg
Germany)
Katharina Biermann (Rotterdam
The Netherlands)
Terri Brentnall (Washington
USA)
Amitabh Chak (Ohio
Petr Dite (Brno
Czech Republic)
Timothy Donahue (California
Dayna Early (Missouri
James Farrell (California
Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo (Massachusetts
Harold Frucht (New York
Noriyoshi Fukushima (Tochigi
Japan)
Jenny Geurts (Wisconsin
Pascal Hamell (Clichy
France)
Julio Iglesias-Garcia (Santiago de Compostela
Spain)
Alison Klein (Maryland
Guenter Kloeppel (Munich
Jesse Lachter (Haifa
Israel)
Peter Langer (Marburg
Jeffrey Lee (Texas
Michael Levy (Minnesota
Hiroyuki Maguchi (Sapporo
Daniel Margolis (Los Angeles
Takao Ohtsuka (Fukuoka
Sara Olson (New York
NY)
Gloria Petersen (Minnesota
Thomas Savides (California
Sapna Syngal (Massachusetts
Eric Tamm (Texas
Masao Tanaka (Fukuoka
Hans Vasen (Leiden
Anja Wagner (Erasmus
Huamin Wang (Texas
David Williams (Sydney
Australia)
Kenjii Yamao (Nagoya
Canto, Mi
Harinck, F
Hruban, Rh
Offerhaus, Gj
Poley, Jw
Kamel, I
Nio, Y
Schulick, R
Bassi, C
Kluijt, I
Levy, Mj
Chak, A
Fockens, P
Goggins, M
Bruno, M
International Cancer of Pancreas Screening (CAPS), Consortium
Arcidiacono, P. G.
(Milan
Italy)
Detlef Bartsch, (Marburg
Germany)
Katharina, Biermann (Rotterdam
The, Netherlands)
Terri Brentnall, (Washington
USA)
Amitabh, Chak (Ohio
Petr Dite, (Brno
Czech, Republic)
Timothy Donahue, (California
Dayna Early, (Missouri
James Farrell, (California
Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo, (Massachusett
Harold Frucht (New, York
Noriyoshi, Fukushima (Tochigi
Japan)
Jenny Geurts, (Wisconsin
Pascal Hamell, (Clichy
France)
Julio Iglesias-Garcia (Santiago de, Compostela
Spain)
Alison Klein, (Maryland
Guenter Kloeppel, (Munich
Jesse Lachter, (Haifa
Israel)
Peter, Langer (Marburg
Jeffrey Lee, (Texa
Michael Levy, (Minnesota
Hiroyuki Maguchi, (Sapporo
Daniel Margolis (Los, Angele
Takao Ohtsuka, (Fukuoka
Sara Olson (New, York
NY)
Gloria Petersen, (Minnesota
Thomas Savides, (California
Sapna Syngal, (Massachusett
Eric Tamm, (Texa
Masao Tanaka, (Fukuoka
Hans Vasen, (Leiden
The Netherlands)
Anja Wagner, (Erasmu
Huamin Wang, (Texa
David Williams, (Sydney
Australia)
Kenjii Yamao, (Nagoya
Pathology
Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism
CCA -Cancer Center Amsterdam
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Source :
Gut, 62(3), 339-347, Gut, 62(3), 339-347. BMJ Publishing Group, Gut, 62(3), 339. BMJ Publishing Group
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Background Screening individuals at increased risk for pancreatic cancer (PC) detects early, potentially curable, pancreatic neoplasia. Objective To develop consortium statements on screening, surveillance and management of high-risk individuals with an inherited predisposition to PC. Methods A 49-expert multidisciplinary international consortium met to discuss pancreatic screening and vote on statements. Consensus was considered reached if ≥75% agreed or disagreed. Results There was excellent agreement that, to be successful, a screening programme should detect and treat T1N0M0 margin-negative PC and high-grade dysplastic precursor lesions (pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm). It was agreed that the following were candidates for screening: first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with PC from a familial PC kindred with at least two affected FDRs; patients with Peutz–Jeghers syndrome; and p16, BRCA2 and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) mutation carriers with ≥1 affected FDR. Consensus was not reached for the age to initiate screening or stop surveillance. It was agreed that initial screening should include endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and/or MRI/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography not CT or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. There was no consensus on the need for EUS fine-needle aspiration to evaluate cysts. There was disagreement on optimal screening modalities and intervals for follow-up imaging. When surgery is recommended it should be performed at a high-volume centre. There was great disagreement as to which screening abnormalities were of sufficient concern to for surgery to be recommended. Conclusions Screening is recommended for high-risk individuals, but more evidence is needed, particularly for how to manage patients with detected lesions. Screening and subsequent management should take place at high-volume centres with multidisciplinary teams, preferably within research protocols.

Details

ISSN :
00175749
Volume :
62
Issue :
3
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Gut
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....36785dd73e00061e39e3405b4d35b313