Back to Search Start Over

Battle of Postdisaster Response and Restoration

Authors :
Jorge Pérez
Alejandra Posada
Yuan Huang
Mario Castro-Gama
Michele Romano
Sergio Muñoz
P. Cuero
Przemysław Zakrzewski
Giovanni Francesco Santonastaso
Juliana Robles
Kevin Woodward
D. Páez
Raziyeh Farmani
Guangtao Fu
Denis Gilbert
David Butler
Juan Saldarriaga
Olivier Piller
Yves Filion
Eirini Nikoloudi
Camilo Salcedo
Fanlin Meng
Jochen Deuerlein
Dragan Savic
Cai Jian
Rafał Brodziak
Herman A. Mahmoud
Attila Bibok
Zoran Kapelan
Sebastián González
Claudia Quintiliani
Enrico Creaco
Yuanzhe Li
Shiyuan Hu
Bogumil Ulanicki
Joong Hoon Kim
Stefano Galelli
Armando Di Nardo
Simone Santopietro
Andrés Aguilar
Kevin Vargas
Chenhao Ou
Edo Abraham
Sophocles Sophocleous
Jinliang Gao
Michele Di Natale
Pedro L. Iglesias-Rey
Marco Franchini
Kegong Diao
Thomas M. Walski
Feifei Zheng
Chris Sweetapple
Jędrzej Bylka
Qingzhou Zhang
Alicja Bałut
Queen's University [Kingston, Canada]
KWR
University of Cassino and Southern Lazio [Cassino]
University of Exeter
University of Regina
University of Leicester
Ontoprise GmbH [Karlsruhe]
Environnement, territoires et infrastructures (UR ETBX)
Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)
Delft University of Technology (TU Delft)
Poznan University of Technology (PUT)
Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT)
University of Duhok
University of Pavia
Budapest University of Technology and Economics [Budapest] (BME)
Universidad de los Andes [Bogota] (UNIANDES)
University of Groningen [Groningen]
Università degli Studi di Ferrara (UniFE)
Singapore Institute of Technology [Singapore] (SIT)
Korea National Open University [Seoul]
Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)
BENTLEY SYSTEMS NANTICOKE USA
Partenaires IRSTEA
Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)-Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)
Paez, D.
Filion, Y.
Castro-Gama, M.
Quintiliani, C.
Santopietro, S.
Sweetapple, C.
Meng, F.
Farmani, R.
Fu, G.
Butler, D.
Zhang, Q.
Zheng, F.
Diao, K.
Ulanicki, B.
Huang, Y.
Deuerlein, J.
Gilbert, D.
Abraham, E.
Piller, O.
Balut, A.
Brodziak, R.
Bylka, J.
Zakrzewski, P.
Li, Y.
Gao, J.
Jian, C.
Ou, C.
Hu, S.
Sophocleous, S.
Nikoloudi, E.
Mahmoud, H.
Woodward, K.
Romano, M.
Santonastaso, G. F.
Creaco, E.
Di Nardo, A.
Di Natale, M.
Bibok, A.
Salcedo, C.
Aguilar, A.
Cuero, P.
Gonzalez, S.
Munoz, S.
Perez, J.
Posada, A.
Robles, J.
Vargas, K.
Franchini, M.
Galelli, S.
Kim, J. H.
Iglesias-Rey, P.
Kapelan, Z.
Saldarriaga, J.
Savic, D.
Walski, T.
Source :
RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia, instname, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2020, 146 (8), 04020067, 13 p. ⟨10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001239⟩
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
American Society of Civil Engineers, 2020.

Abstract

International audience; The paper presents the results of the Battle of Postdisaster Response and Restoration (BPDRR) presented in a special session at the first International water distribution systems analysis & computing and control in the water industry (WDSA/CCWI) Joint Conference, held in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, in July 2018. The BPDRR problem focused on how to respond and restore water service after the occurrence of five earthquake scenarios that cause structural damage in a water distribution system. Participants were required to propose a prioritization schedule to fix the damages of each scenario while following restrictions on visibility/nonvisibility of damages. Each team/approach was evaluated against six performance criteria: (1)time without supply for hospital/firefighting, (2)rapidity of recovery, (3)resilience loss, (4)average time of no user service, (5)number of users without service for eight consecutive hours, and (6)water loss. Three main types of approaches were identified from the submissions: (1)general-purpose metaheuristic algorithms, (2)greedy algorithms, and (3)ranking-based prioritizations. All three approaches showed potential to solve the challenge efficiently. The results of the participants showed that for this network, the impact of a large-diameter pipe failure on the network is more significant than several smaller pipes failures. The location of isolation valves and the size of hydraulic segments influenced the resilience of the system during emergencies. On average, the interruptions to water supply (hospitals and firefighting) varied considerably among solutions and emergency scenarios, highlighting the importance of private water storage for emergencies. The effects of damages and repair work were more noticeable during the peak demand periods (morning and noontime) than during the low-flow periods; and tank storage helped to preserve functionality of the network in the first few hours after a simulated event.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07339496
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia, instname, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2020, 146 (8), 04020067, 13 p. ⟨10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001239⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....34c472a8021b9bf3deb8d06264decb0f
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001239