Back to Search
Start Over
Complex machine-learning algorithms and multivariable logistic regression on par in the prediction of insufficient clinical response to methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis
- Source :
- Journal of Personalized Medicine, 11(1):44, 1-12. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), Gosselt, H R, Verhoeven, M M A, Bulatović-ćalasan, M, Welsing, P M, de Rotte, M C F J, Hazes, J M W, Lafeber, F P J G, Hoogendoorn, M & de Jonge, R 2021, ' Complex machine-learning algorithms and multivariable logistic regression on par in the prediction of insufficient clinical response to methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis ', Journal of personalized medicine, vol. 11, no. 1, 44, pp. 1-12 . https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11010044, Journal of personalized medicine, 11(1):44, 1-12. MDPI, Journal of Personalized Medicine, Volume 11, Issue 1, Journal of personalized medicine, 11(1):44, 1-12. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), Journal of Personalized Medicine, Vol 11, Iss 44, p 44 (2021), Journal of Personalized Medicine, 11(1):44, 1-12. MDPI Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- MDPI, 2021.
-
Abstract
- The goals of this study were to examine whether machine-learning algorithms outperform multivariable logistic regression in the prediction of insufficient response to methotrexate (MTX)<br />secondly, to examine which features are essential for correct prediction<br />and finally, to investigate whether the best performing model specifically identifies insufficient responders to MTX (combination) therapy. The prediction of insufficient response (3-month Disease Activity Score 28-Erythrocyte-sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) &gt<br />3.2) was assessed using logistic regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). The baseline features of 355 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients from the &ldquo<br />treatment in the Rotterdam Early Arthritis CoHort&rdquo<br />(tREACH) and the U-Act-Early trial were combined for analyses. The model performances were compared using area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and sensitivity and specificity. Finally, the best performing model following feature selection was tested on 101 RA patients starting tocilizumab (TCZ)-monotherapy. Logistic regression (AUC = 0.77 95% CI: 0.68&ndash<br />0.86) performed as well as LASSO (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.67&ndash<br />0.85), random forest (AUC = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.61 = 0.81), and XGBoost (AUC = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.61&ndash<br />0.81), yet logistic regression reached the highest sensitivity (81%). The most important features were baseline DAS28 (components). For all algorithms, models with six features performed similarly to those with 16. When applied to the TCZ-monotherapy group, logistic regression&rsquo<br />s sensitivity significantly dropped from 83% to 69% (p = 0.03). In the current dataset, logistic regression performed equally well compared to machine-learning algorithms in the prediction of insufficient response to MTX. Models could be reduced to six features, which are more conducive for clinical implementation. Interestingly, the prediction model was specific to MTX (combination) therapy response.
- Subjects :
- rheumatoid
lcsh:Medicine
Medicine (miscellaneous)
Logistic regression
Article
methotrexate
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Lasso (statistics)
therapeutics
Medicine
outcome assessment
030304 developmental biology
030203 arthritis & rheumatology
0303 health sciences
Receiver operating characteristic
business.industry
lcsh:R
Area under the curve
healthcare
medicine.disease
Confidence interval
Random forest
arthritis
Rheumatoid arthritis
Cohort
business
Algorithm
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 20754426
- Volume :
- 11
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of personalized medicine
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....34a523a1d505d8034cb1000c8d57076d
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11010044