Back to Search Start Over

Effort-reward imbalance at work and incident coronary heart disease : a multi-cohort study of 90,164 individuals

Authors :
Johannes Siegrist
Paula Salo
Reiner Rugulies
Jan H. Pejtersen
Töres Theorell
Mika Kivimäki
Karl-Heinz Jöckel
Katriina Heikkilä
Anders Knutsson
Jürgen Schupp
Thorsten Lunau
Marie Zins
Mark Hamer
Raimund Erbel
Solja T. Nyberg
Marcel Goldberg
G. David Batty
Maria Nordin
Göran Fahlén
Marianne Borritz
Jaana Pentti
Archana Singh-Manoux
Hermann Burr
Eleonor I. Fransson
Hugo Westerlund
Peter Westerholm
Jussi Vahtera
Nico Dragano
Tuula Oksanen
Andrew Steptoe
Ida E. H. Madsen
Jakob B. Bjorner
Martin L. Nielsen
Lars Alfredsson
Marianna Virtanen
Source :
Dragano, N, Siegrist, J, Nyberg, S T, Lunau, T, Fransson, E I, Alfredsson, L, Bjorner, J B, Borritz, M, Burr, H, Erbel, R, Fahlen, G, Goldberg, M, Hamer, M, Heikkila, K, Joeckel, K-H, Knutsson, A, Madsen, I E H, Nielsen, M L, Nordin, M, Oksanen, T, Pejtersen, J H, Pentti, J, Rugulies, R, Salo, P, Schupp, J, Singh-Manoux, A, Steptoe, A, Theorell, T, Vahtera, J, Westerholm, P J M, Westerlund, H, Virtanen, M, Zins, M, Batty, G D & Kivimaki, M 2017, ' Effort-Reward Imbalance at Work and Incident Coronary Heart Disease : A Multicohort Study of 90,164 Individuals ', Epidemiology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 619-626 . https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000666
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Hälsohögskolan, Högskolan i Jönköping, HHJ, Avd. för naturvetenskap och biomedicin, 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic evidence for work stress as a risk factor for coronary heart disease is mostly based on a single measure of stressful work known as job strain, a combination of high demands and low job control. We examined whether a complementary stress measure that assesses an imbalance between efforts spent at work and rewards received predicted coronary heart disease. METHODS: This multi-cohort study (the 'IPD-Work' consortium) was based on harmonized individual-level data from 11 European prospective cohort studies. Stressful weappork in 90,164 men and women without coronary heart disease at baseline was assessed by validated effort-reward imbalance and job strain questionnaires. We defined incident coronary heart disease as the first non-fatal myocardial infarction or coronary death. Study-specific estimates were pooled by random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: At baseline, 31.7% of study members reported effort-reward imbalance at work and 15.9% reported job strain. During a mean follow-up of 9.8 years, 1078 coronary events were recorded. After adjustment for potential confounders, a hazard ratio of 1.16 (95% confidence interval 1.00-1.35) was observed for effort-reward imbalance compared to no imbalance. The hazard ratio was 1.16 (1.01-1.34) for having either effort-reward imbalance or job strain, and 1.41 (1.12-1.76) for having both these stressors compared to having neither effort-reward imbalance nor job strain. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with effort-reward imbalance at work have an increased risk of coronary heart disease, and this appears to be independent of job strain experienced. These findings support expanding focus beyond just job strain in future research on work stress.This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Dragano, N, Siegrist, J, Nyberg, S T, Lunau, T, Fransson, E I, Alfredsson, L, Bjorner, J B, Borritz, M, Burr, H, Erbel, R, Fahlen, G, Goldberg, M, Hamer, M, Heikkila, K, Joeckel, K-H, Knutsson, A, Madsen, I E H, Nielsen, M L, Nordin, M, Oksanen, T, Pejtersen, J H, Pentti, J, Rugulies, R, Salo, P, Schupp, J, Singh-Manoux, A, Steptoe, A, Theorell, T, Vahtera, J, Westerholm, P J M, Westerlund, H, Virtanen, M, Zins, M, Batty, G D & Kivimaki, M 2017, ' Effort-Reward Imbalance at Work and Incident Coronary Heart Disease : A Multicohort Study of 90,164 Individuals ', Epidemiology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 619-626 . https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000666
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....33e0872a1a3f3764d58988fd4f801b64
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000666